The popular appeal of apocalyptic ai
Zygon 45 (4):1003-1020 (2010)
| Abstract | The belief that computers will soon become transcendently intelligent and that human beings will “upload” their minds into machines has become ubiquitous in public discussions of robotics and artificial intelligence in Western cultures. Such beliefs are the result of pervasive Judaeo-Christian apocalyptic beliefs, and they have rapidly spread through modern pop and technological culture, including such varied and influential sources as Rolling Stone, the IEEE Spectrum, and official United States government reports. They have gained sufficient credibility to enable the construction of Singularity University in California. While different approaches are possible (and, indeed, are common in Japan and possibly elsewhere), this particular vision of artificial intelligence and robotics has gained ground in the West through the influence of figures such as Hans Moravec and Ray Kurzweil. Because pop-science books help frame public discussion of new sciences and technologies for individuals, corporations, and governments alike, the integration of religious and technoscientific claims made by their authors should be clear and open for public and scientific debate. As we move forward into an increasingly robotic future, we should do so aware of the ways in which a group's religious environment can help set the tone for public acceptance and use of robotic technologies | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLee McCauley (2007). AI Armageddon and the Three Laws of Robotics. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2).
C. T. A. Schmidt (2011). Technology and Culture and Possibly Vigilance Too. AI and Society 26 (4):371-375.
Eric Steinhart (2008). Teilhard de Chardin and Transhumanism. Journal of Evolution and Technology 20:1-22.
Porfirio Silva & Pedro U. Lima (2007). Institutional Robotics. In F. Almeida e Costa et al (ed.), Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 2007. Springer-Verlag.
C. T. A. Schmidt (2005). Of Robots and Believing. Minds and Machines 15 (2):195-205.
Marcus Hutter (2012). Can Intelligence Explode? Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (1-2):143-166.
Michael E. Zimmerman (2008). The Singularity: A Crucial Phase in Divine Self-Actualization? Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 4 (1-2):347-370.
Hans Moravec, Robotics. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online.
Jerold J. Abrams (2004). Pragmatism, Artificial Intelligence, and Posthuman Bioethics: Shusterman, Rorty, Foucault. Human Studies 27 (3):241-258.
Thomas E. Horton, Arpan Chakraborty & Robert St Amant (2012). Affordances for Robots: A Brief Survey. Avant 3 (2):70-84.
Selmer Bringsjord & David A. Ferrucci (1998). Logic and Artificial Intelligence: Divorced, Still Married, Separated ...? Minds and Machines 8 (2).
Tim Smithers (1998). In Time and Over Time. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):651-652.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-11-15Total downloads11 ( #100,866 of 556,895 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,895 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
