David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
St. Martin's Press (2000)
The Skeptic’s Oakeshott poses the thesis that Michael Oakeshott’s political philosophy is best understood from the vantage point of his skepticism and his intellectual affinity to Hobbes. Margaret Thatcher based much of her political philosophy on Oakeshott’s theories, but Gerencser shows how she widely misinterpreted his work. He argues persuasively against those who understand Oakeshott in terms of the influence of British idealism. Instead, Gerencser argues that Oakeshott adopts and softens Hobbes' idea of consent as the basis of political authority. By insisting that political authority has its source in acknowledgement and recognition, Oakeshott’s philosophy opens the doors to democratic politics. The book ends with persuasive criticisms of Oakeshott.
|Keywords||Oakeshott, Michael Joseph Hobbes, Thomas Political science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$8.51 used (90% off) $56.20 new (30% off) $79.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||JC257.O244.G47 2000|
|ISBN(s)||031222303X 9780312223038 0333913868|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kevin Williams (1989). The Dilemma of Michael Oakeshott: Oakeshott's Treatment of Equality of Opportunity in Education and His Political Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy of Education 23 (2):223–240.
Elizabeth Corey (2009). Religion and the Mode of Practice in Michael Oakeshott. Zygon 44 (1):139-151.
Efraim Podoksik (2009). Commentary on Elizabeth Corey's Interpretation of Michael Oakeshott. Zygon 44 (1):223-226.
Leslie Marsh (2010). Ryle and Oakeshott on the “Knowing-How/Knowing-That” Distinction. In Corey Abel (ed.), The Meanings of Michael Oakeshott's Conservatism.
Paul Franco (2003). Oakeshott, Berlin, and Liberalism. Political Theory 31 (4):484-507.
Corey Abel (2005). Appropriating Aristotle. In Corey Abel Timothy Fuller (ed.), The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott.
Corey Abel (2011). Oakeshott’s Wise Defense: Christianity as A Civilization. In The Meanings of Michael Oakeshott's Christianity.
Efraim Podoksik (ed.) (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Oakeshott. Cambridge University Press.
Leslie Marsh (2005). Constructivism and Relativism in Oakeshott. In Corey Abel & Timothy Fuller (eds.), In The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Imprint Academic
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #549,393 of 1,793,156 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,411 of 1,793,156 )
How can I increase my downloads?