Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 140 (3):437 - 445 (2008)
|Abstract||Jason Stanley has criticized a contextualist solution to the sorites paradox that treats vagueness as a kind of indexicality. His objection rests on a feature of indexicals that seems plausible: that their reference remains fixed in verb phrase ellipsis. But the force of Stanley’s criticism depends on the undefended assumption that vague terms, if they are a special sort of indexical, must function in the same way that more paradigmatic indexicals do. This paper argues that there can be more than one sort of indexicality, that one term might easily have both sorts, and that therefore, and despite Stanley’s worries, vagueness might easily be assimilated to one form.|
|Keywords||Vagueness Sorites Indexicality Contextualism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tomis Kapitan (2001). Indexical Identification: A Perspectival Account. Philosophical Psychology 14 (3):293 – 312.
Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore (2002). Indexicality, Binding, Anaphora and A Priori Truth. Analysis 62 (4):271 - 281.
Allyson Mount (2008). The Impurity of “Pure” Indexicals. Philosophical Studies 138 (2):193 - 209.
Ernest Lepore (2002). Indexicality, Binding, Anaphora and a Priori Truth. Analysis 62 (4):271-281.
John Perry (1998). Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents. In Proceedings of the 1995 CSLI-Armsterdam Logic, Language and Computation Conference. CSLI Publications.
Jason Stanley (2003). Context, Interest Relativity and the Sorites. Analysis 63 (4):269–281.
Rogério Passos Severo (2012). A Note on Essential Indexicals of Direction. Thought 1 (1):10-15.
Jonathan Ellis (2004). Context, Indexicals and the Sorites. Analysis 64 (4):362–364.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #23,204 of 739,368 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,368 )
How can I increase my downloads?