The Saint Germain MS. of the Thebaid (Paris B.N. 13046)

Classical Quarterly 27 (3-4):129- (1933)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ever since Ph. Kohlmann in his Teubner edition of the Thebaid asserted that he had used cod. Parisinus 13046, one of the MSS. formerly of St. Germain des Prés, this MS. has been known by reputation to his successors and other students of Statian textual problems, and, designed by the letter S, it is alluded to and cited in the edition of Garrod and in the newer Teubner of Klotz, which appeared in 1908. The two later editors confessed that they themselves had not examined the MS., but were relying upon the information accessible in Kohlmann's edition. Doubts having been cast from more than one source upon Kohlmann's accuracy and the soundness of his reports, while at the same time the importance of S as a member of the ω group was emphasized by Mr. Garrod and Dr. Klotz in spite of the incomplete evidence at their disposal, it seemed worth while to the writer to examine the MS. for himself and to make a thorough collation of it. This has been done in the summer of 1932

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saint Francis and Philosophy.Germain Kopaczynski - 1990 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 64 (2):249-260.
The prophets of Paris.Frank Edward Manuel - 1962 - Cambridge,: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
20 (#723,940)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Manuscript Tradition of the Thebaid.D. E. Hill - 1966 - Classical Quarterly 16 (02):333-.
The Manuscript Tradition of the Thebaid.D. E. Hill - 1966 - Classical Quarterly 16 (2):333-346.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Statius.W. P. Mustard & J. H. Mozley - 1928 - American Journal of Philology 49 (4):402.

Add more references