Graduate studies at Western
Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2):129-156 (2002)
|Abstract||In this paper I present experimental data showing that the interpretation of donkey sentences is influenced by certain aspects of world knowledge that seem to elude introspective observation, which I try to explain by reference to a scale ranging from prototypical individuals (like children) to quite marginal ones (such as railway lines). This ontological cline interacts with the semantics of donkey sentences: as suggested already by the anecdotal data on which much of the literature is based, the effect of world knowledge is by and large restricted to donkey sentences with non-intersective determiners. I outline a psychological model which incorporates both ontological and logical factors, and suggest that there may be something wrong with the standard assumption that a statement's receiving a truth value requires that it have a definite reading.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
S. J. Harrison (1993). Donkey Business Carl C. Schlam: The Metamorphoses of Apuleius: On Making an Ass of Oneself. Pp. X + 176; 6 Black and White Figures. London: Duckworth, 1992. £25. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (01):63-64.
Makoto Kanazawa (1994). Weak Vs. Strong Readings of Donkey Sentences and Monotonicity Inference in a Dynamic Setting. Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (2):109 - 158.
Mark Heller (2008). The Donkey Problem. Philosophical Studies 140 (1):83 - 101.
Adrian Brasoveanu (2008). Donkey Pluralities: Plural Information States Versus Non-Atomic Individuals. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2):129 - 209.
Jan Eijck & Fer-Jan Vries (1992). Dynamic Interpretation and HOARE Deduction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1 (1):1-44.
Y. Wang (2009). Counterfactual Donkey Sentences: A Response to Robert van Rooij. Journal of Semantics 26 (3):317-328.
Philippe Schlenker (2011). Donkey Anaphora: The View From Sign Language (ASL and LSF). [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (4):341-395.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 731,329 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 731,329 )
How can I increase my downloads?