David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 57 (2):225 - 247 (1983)
Rationality and reasonableness are often sharply distinguished from one another and are even held to be in conflict. On this construal, rationality consists in means-end calculation of the most efficient means to one's ends (which are usually taken to be self-interested), while reasonableness consists in equitableness whereby one respects the rights of other persons as well as oneself. To deal with this conflict, it is noted that both rationality and reasonableness are based on reason, which is analyzed as the power of attaining truth, and especially necessary truth. It is then shown that, by the rationality involved in reason, the moral principle of reasonableness, the Principle of Generic Consistency (PGC), has a stringently rational justification in that to deny or violate it is to incur self-contradiction. Objections are considered bearing on relevance and motivation. It is concluded that, where reasonableness and egoistic rationality conflict, the former is rationally superior.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Philippa Foot (1974). 'Is Morality a System of Hypothetical Imperatives?' A Reply to Mr. Holmes. Analysis 35 (2):53 - 56.
Philippa Foot (1972). Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives. Philosophical Review 81 (3):305-316.
Philippa Foot (1997). Virtues and Vices. In Daniel Statman (ed.), Noûs. Georgetown University Press 163--177.
W. K. Frankena (1958). Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy. In A. I. Melden (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. University of Washington Press
Alan Gewirth (1978). Reason and Morality. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Benjamin Capps (2011). Libertarianism, Legitimation, and the Problems of Regulating Cognition-Enhancing Drugs. Neuroethics 4 (2):119-128.
Robert J. Richards (1986). Justification Through Biological Faith: A Rejoinder. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 1 (3):337-354.
Edward Howlett Spence (2010). The Normative Structure of Information and its Communication. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 8 (2):150-163.
Similar books and articles
J. T. Stevenson (1989). Reasonableness in Morals. Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):95 - 107.
Emmanuel Chukwudi Eze (2008). On Reason: Rationality in a World of Cultural Conflict and Racism. Duke University Press.
Polycarp Ikuenobe (2001). Rationality, Practical Reasonableness, and the Social and Moral Foundation of a Legal System. Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (3):245–267.
Annette Rid (2009). Justice and Procedure: How Does “Accountability for Reasonableness” Result in Fair Limit-Setting Decisions? Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (1):12-16.
Shaun Young (2005). The (Un)Reasonableness of Rawlsian Rationality. South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (4):308-20.
Toon Vandevelde (1993). Rationality and Reasonableness. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (1):85 – 86.
Nicholas C. Burbules (1991). Rationality and Reasonableness: A Discussion of Harvey Siegel's Relativism Refuted and Educating Reason. Educational Theory 41 (2):235-252.
James Boettcher (2004). What is Reasonableness? Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (5-6):597-621.
William J. Collinge (1988). The Relation of Religious Community Life to Rationality in Augustine. Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):242-253.
Doan Travann (2001). Reason, Rationality, and Reasonableness. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads59 ( #40,635 of 1,699,481 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #62,577 of 1,699,481 )
How can I increase my downloads?