Graduate studies at Western
Diogenes 45 (180):1-19 (1997)
|Abstract||In fact, analogy is a legitimate form of comparison, and comparison is the only practical means we have for the understanding of things. The fault of the biological sociologists was not that they used it but that they used it wrongly. Instead of trying to control their studies of society by their knowledge of biol ogy, they tried to infer the laws of the first from the laws of the second|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis (1994). Organizing Evolution: Founding the Society for the Study of Evolution (1939-1950). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 27 (2):241 - 309.
J. M. Fritzman & Molly Gibson (2012). Schelling, Hegel, and Evolutionary Progress. Perspectives on Science 20 (1):105-128.
Marcello Barbieri (2003). The Organic Codes: An Introduction to Semantic Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Patrick Tort (1988). Introducción a la Antropología Darwiniana. Theoria 4 (1):31-54.
Timothy Shanahan (2004). The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge University Press.
H. S. Jennings (1933/1971). The Universe and Life. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Russ Hodge (2009). Evolution: The History of Life on Earth. Facts on File.
Mark J. Pallen (2009). The Rough Guide to Evolution. Rough Guides.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads1 ( #292,878 of 740,453 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?