David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Diogenes 45 (180):1-19 (1997)
In fact, analogy is a legitimate form of comparison, and comparison is the only practical means we have for the understanding of things. The fault of the biological sociologists was not that they used it but that they used it wrongly. Instead of trying to control their studies of society by their knowledge of biol ogy, they tried to infer the laws of the first from the laws of the second.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis (1994). Organizing Evolution: Founding the Society for the Study of Evolution (1939-1950). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 27 (2):241 - 309.
Mark J. Pallen (2009). The Rough Guide to Evolution. Rough Guides.
Russ Hodge (2009). Evolution: The History of Life on Earth. Facts on File.
H. S. Jennings (1933/1971). The Universe and Life. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Timothy Shanahan (2004). The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Patrick Tort (1988). Introducción a la Antropología Darwiniana. Theoria 4 (1):31-54.
Marcello Barbieri (2003). The Organic Codes: An Introduction to Semantic Biology. Cambridge University Press.
J. M. Fritzman & Molly Gibson (2012). Schelling, Hegel, and Evolutionary Progress. Perspectives on Science 20 (1):105-128.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads1 ( #628,897 of 1,724,752 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?