Elements of Physical Reality, Nonlocality and Stochasticity in Relativistic Dynamical Reduction Models
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:35 - 47 (1990)
The problem of getting a relativistic generalization of the CSL dynamical reduction model, which has been presented in part I, is discussed. In so doing we have the opportunity to introduce the idea of a stochastically invariant theory. The theoretical model we present, that satisfies this kind of invariance requirement, offers us the possibility to reconsider, from a new point of view, some conceptually relevant issues such as nonlocality, the legitimacy of attributing elements of physical reality to physical systems and the problem of establishing causal relations between physical events.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
GianCarlo Ghirardi & Renata Grassi (1994). Outcome Predictions and Property Attribution: The EPR Argument Reconsidered. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (3):397-423.
Similar books and articles
Angelo Bassi & GianCarlo Ghirardi (1999). More About Dynamical Reduction and the Enumeration Principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):719 - 734.
A. Bassi & G.-C. Ghirardi (1999). Discussion. More About Dynamical Reduction and the Enumeration Principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):719-734.
GianCarlo Ghirardi & Philip Pearle (1990). Dynamical Reduction Theories: Changing Quantum Theory so the Statevector Represents Reality. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:19 - 33.
Peter Holland & Harvey R. Brown (2003). The Non-Relativistic Limits of the Maxwell and Dirac Equations: The Role of Galilean and Gauge Invariance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (2):161-187.
Vassilios Karakostas & Michael Dickson (1995). Decoherence in Unorthodox Formulations of Quantum Mechanics. Synthese 102 (1):61 - 97.
D. Dieks (2001). Space and Time in Particle and Field Physics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (2):217-241.
Sahotra Sarkar (1992). Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism. Synthese 91 (3):167-94.
Bruce Bridgeman (1998). The Dynamical Model is a Perceptron. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):631-632.
Robin Le Poidevin (2005). Missing Elements and Missing Premises: A Combinatorial Argument for the Ontological Reduction of Chemistry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):117-134.
GC Ghirardi & A. Bassi (1999). Do Dynamical Reduction Models Imply That Arithmetic Does Not Apply to Ordinary Macroscopic Objects? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):49-64.
Robert Larmer (2009). Divine Agency and the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. Zygon 44 (3):543-557.
William M. Kallfelz (2009). Physical Emergence and Process Ontology. Process Studies 65 (1):42 – 60.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads3 ( #334,038 of 1,410,434 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,872 of 1,410,434 )
How can I increase my downloads?