Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):49-66 (2012)
|Abstract||In the letters written to the Thessalonians, Paul’s teaching appears to be irreconcilably divided between a still influential Judaic apocalyptic eschatology and (due to Timothy’s considerable influence in the development of the gospel), an emphasis on Hellenistic self-transformation and, in particular, how the philosophy of Epicurus contributed to the psychological health of recent converts. By interpreting the rhetoric of wrath, quiet, sleep, and childbirth, Paul’s teaching as it emerges in 1 and 2 Thessalonians reveals how the gospel must necessarily encounter, agonistically, two foundations of thought. During the early composition of the letters to his churches, Paul struggles ambivalently between the persistence of a Judaic past and its metaphysical promise of a and , and the realization that Hellenistic philosophy, and Timothy’s Epicurean pastoral care, provides immediate comfort to the well-being of others|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Geoffrey Turner (2007). FRom Hope to Despair in Thessalonica: Situating 1 and 2 Thessalonians. By Colin R Nicholl, Theological Hermeneutics and 1 Thessalonians. By Angus Paddison, Reading Romans Through the Centuries: FRom the Early Church to Karl Barth. Edited by Jeffrey P Greenman and Timothy Larsen, Social-Science Commentary of the Letters of Paul. By Bruce J Malina and John J Pilch, Re-Examining Paul's Letters: The History of the Pauline Correspondence. By Bo Reicke and Edited by David P Moessner and Ingalisa Reicke and a Feminist Companion to Paul. Edited by Amy-Jill Levine. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 48 (4):621–625.
Geoffrey Turner (2009). Paul's Necessary Sin: The Experience of Liberation. By Timothy Ashworth Paul and His World: Interpreting the New Testament in its Context. By Helmut Koester. Heythrop Journal 50 (1):145-147.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2006). More Letters by Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on Proto-Structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):610-632.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1995). Two Letters of Paul Feyerabend to Thomas S. Kuhn on a Draft of the Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (3):353-387.
James Armstrong (1993). One Protestant Looks at Centesimus Annus. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (12):933 - 944.
John J. Conley (2002). The Limits of Metaphysical Reason. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:117-123.
Paul Hager & Michael Peters (2000). Symposium on Thinking Again: Education After Postmodernism by Nigel Blake, Richard Smith, Paul Standish & Paul Smeyers. Educational Philosophy and Theory 32 (3):309–310.
Melinda Rosenberg (2008). Nietzsche, Competition and Athletic Ability. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (3):274 – 284.
J. M. Mossman (1994). The Agon in Euripides Michael Lloyd: The Agon in Euripides. Pp. Vii+145. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992. Cased, £25. The Classical Review 44 (02):261-262.
Paul Redding (2000). Dialectic and Gospel in the Development of Hegel's Thinking. Dialogue 39 (4):852-854.
Timothy Redman (1983). Agon. The Review of Metaphysics 37 (1):105-106.
Timothy W. Crusius (1988). Response to Paul G. Bator. Philosophy and Rhetoric 21 (2):153 - 157.
D. Mervyn Jones (1961). The Agon in Aristophanes Thomas Gelzer: Der Epirrhematische Agon Bei Aristophanes. (Zetemata, Heft 23.) Pp. Xiii + 296. Munich: Beck, 1960. Paper, DM. 35. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 11 (02):118-120.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads2 ( #246,545 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?