David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy 87 (04):497-508 (2012)
Russell's book The Problems of Philosophy was first published a hundred years ago.¹ A remarkable feature of this enduring text is the glint of Platonism it presents on a dark empiricist sea: while our knowledge of physical objects is entirely mediated by direct awareness of sense data, we can also have direct awareness of certain universals, Russell claims.² This is questionable, even if one has no empiricist inclination. Universals are abstract, hence causally inert. How, then, can we have any knowledge of them, direct or indirect? This paper is about Russell's answer to that question. I will argue that given some modification and elaboration of Russell's views, his claim that some universals are knowable by acquaintance is plausible
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
George Berkeley (1940/2003). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dover Publications.
Earl Conee (1994). Phenomenal Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (2):136-150.
A. A. Luce & T. E. Jessop (eds.) (1948-1957). The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Thomas Nelson.
Bertrand Russell (1912/2004). The Problems of Philosophy. Barnes & Noble Books.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nikolay Milkov (2001). The History or Russell's Concepts 'Sense-Data' and 'Knowledge by Acquaintance'. Archiv Fuer Begriffsgeschichte 43:221-231.
Paulo Faria (2010). Memory as Acquaintance with the Past: Some Lessons From Russell, 1912-1914. Kriterion 51 (121):149-172.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2010). Hegel, Russell, and the Foundations of Philosophy. In Angelica Nuzzo (ed.), Hegel and the Analytical Tradition. Continuum.
Alan R. White (1981). Knowledge, Acquaintance, and Awareness. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6 (1):159-172.
E. D. Klemke (1960). Universals and Particulars in a Phenomenalist Ontology. Philosophy of Science 27 (3):254-261.
Larry Lee Blackman (1983). Russell on the Relations of Universals and Particulars. Philosophy Research Archives 9:265-278.
Sajahan Miah (2006). Russell's Theory of Perception 1905-1919. New York: Continuum.
Bertrand Russell (1910). Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11:108--28.
Bertrand Russell (1917). ``Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description&Quot. In Mysticism and Logic. London: Longmans Green.
Bertrand Russell (1914). On the Nature of Acquaintance, Part II. The Monist 24 (2):161-187.
Gary S. Rosenkrantz (1984). Acquaintance. Philosophia 14 (August):1-24.
Ruth L. Saw (1952). Our Knowledge of Individuals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52:167-188.
Herbert Hochberg (1965). On Being and Being Presented. Philosophy of Science 32 (2):123-136.
John C. Bigelow & Robert Pargetter (1990). Acquaintance with Qualia. Theoria 61 (3):129-147.
Added to index2012-10-05
Total downloads11 ( #131,838 of 1,096,620 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #51,759 of 1,096,620 )
How can I increase my downloads?