David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1):27-57 (1992)
The problem of assessing the sustainability of human development is discussed in theoretical and practical terms.In Part I, two theoretical tools for describing the challenge of assessing sustainable development are introduced and briefly discussed: (i) the use of an energetic model to describe the dynamic interaction between the human and the biophysical compartment; (ii) basic concepts derived from the hierarchy theory applied to the development of human society. Sustainable and ethical development of human society requires the consideration of three hierarchical levels: the biosphere, the societal and the individual level. Such a holistic assessment can be obtained by integrating scientific and ethical considerations.
|Keywords||sustainable development natural resource management assessment of technology hierarchy theory energy analysis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
T. F. H. Allen & Thomas B. Starr (1982). Hierarchy Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen (1976). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Synthese 33 (2):371-391.
D. Pimentel, J. Allen, A. Beers, L. Guinand, R. Linder, P. McLaughlin, B. Meer, D. Musonda, D. Perdue, S. Poisson, S. Siebert, K. Stoner, R. Salazar & A. Hawkins (1987). World Agriculture and Soil Erosion. BioScience 37 (4):277-283.
David Pimentel (1991). Ethanol Fuels: Energy Security, Economics, and the Environment. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 4 (1):1-13.
David Pimentel, Ulrich Stachow, David A. Takacs, Hans W. Brubaker, Amy R. Dumas, John J. Meaney, Douglas E. Onsi & David B. Corzilius (1992). Conserving Biological Diversity in Agricultural/Forestry Systems. BioScience 42 (5):354-362.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Frank P. LeVeness & Patrick D. Primeaux (2004). Vicarious Ethics: Politics, Business, and Sustainable Development. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):185-198.
Asterios G. Kefalas (2001). The Environmentally Sustainable Organization (ESO): A Systems Approach. Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):90-105.
Robin Attfield (2007). Sustainable Development Revisited. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 3:185-189.
W. Mckinney (2000). Of Sustainability and Precaution The Logical, Epistemological, and Moral Problems of the Precautionary Principle and Their Implications for Sustainable Development. Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):77-87.
Matthias Jahnke & Hans G. Nutzinger (2003). Sustainability?A Theoretical Idea or a Practical Recipe? Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):275-294.
Andrew H. T. Fergus & Julie I. A. Rowney (2005). Sustainable Development: Epistemological Frameworks & an Ethic of Choice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):197 - 207.
M. Haque (2000). Environmental Discourse and Sustainable Development Linkages and Limitations. Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):3-21.
Joseph R. Herkert (1998). Sustainable Development, Engineering and Multinational Corporations: Ethical and Public Policy Implications. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (3):333-346.
Joanna Becker (2007). How Frameworks Can Help Operationalize Sustainable Development Indicators. World Futures 63 (2):137 – 150.
A. H. T. Fergus & J. I. A. Rowney (2005). Sustainable Development: Lost Meaning and Opportunity? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (1):17 - 27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #215,417 of 1,699,716 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #206,271 of 1,699,716 )
How can I increase my downloads?