David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Argumentation 26 (3):393-407 (2012)
An argument can be superficially valid and rhetorically effective even if what is plausibly meant, what is derived from what, and how it is derived is not at all clear. An example of such an argument is provided by Socrates’s famous refutation of Euthyphro’s second definition of holy, which is generally regarded as clearly valid and successful. This paper provides a stricter logical analysis than the ones in the literature. In particular, it is shown that the argument contains a syntactically ambiguous expression, a passage that needs to be read charitably, and a previously unnoticed but crucial shift between two notions of unholy. Different analyses may be provided, depending on how these interpretation problems are solved. The conditions under which the refutation is valid and successful are far from obvious, and are here explicitly specified
|Keywords||Socrates Validity Ambiguity Rhetoric|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hugh H. Benson (2000). Socratic Wisdom: The Model of Knowledge in Plato's Early Dialogues. Oxford University Press.
Gregory Vlastos (1994). Socratic Studies. Cambridge University Press.
Anil Gupta (2008). Definitions. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Richard Robinson (1950). Definition. Clarendon Press.
Richard Robinson (1953). Plato's Earlier Dialectic. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kim (2004). A Chiastic Contradiction at Euthyphro 9e1-11b5. Phronesis 49 (3):219-224.
S. Marc Cohen (1971). Socrates on the Definition of Piety. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1):1-13.
Christopher Menzel (1998). Logical Form. In Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge
Andrew Chrucky (1998). Teaching Validity with a Stanley Thermos. Philosophy Now 22:22-23.
Matthew Evans (2010). A Partisan's Guide to Socratic Intellectualism. In Sergio Tenenbaum (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good. Oxford University Press 6.
Michael Baumgartner (2010). Informal Reasoning and Logical Formalization. In S. Conrad & S. Imhof (eds.), Ding und Begriff. Ontos
Brendan O'Sullivan (2006). The Euthyphro Argument (9d–11b). Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):657-675.
Kristin Mickelson (2010). The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
Hisayasu Kobayashi (2011). Prajñākaragupta on the Two Truths and Argumentation. Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (4-5):427-439.
Damian Cox (2000). Scepticism and the Interpreter. Philosophical Papers 29 (2):61-72.
Luca Castagnoli (2004). Protagoras Refuted: How Clever is Socrates' "Most Clever" Argument at Theaetetus 171a–C? Topoi 23 (1):3-32.
Terence Irwin (2006). Socrates and Euthyphro: The Argument and its Revival. In Lindsay Judson & V. Karasmanēs (eds.), Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press
Added to index2012-04-09
Total downloads14 ( #311,869 of 1,902,528 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #452,252 of 1,902,528 )
How can I increase my downloads?