David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 21 (2):103-127 (2003)
Despite frequent references in the sociological literature to Durkheim's theory about the division of labor, sociologists have made few attempts to test it. The paucity of attempts and the very debatable outcomes thereof are due largely to Durkheim's use of the traditional discursive mode of theory construction. A discursively stated theory's logical structure is likely to be obscure, and for that reason alone tests of it are difficult and controversial. Rather than perpetuate the exegetical tradition in sociological treatments of the subject, this paper restates Durkheim's theory in accordance with a particular formal mode. That restatement identifies the theory's shortcomings and problems. But the eight premises imply only one testable theorem, and the theorem's predictive accuracy appears minimal unless "population concentration" is substituted for "density" in the first axiom. Nonetheless, the restatement clearly shows how extension of the theory (additional postulates) could further its testability
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Elizabeth Garnsey (1981). The Rediscovery of the Division of Labor. Theory and Society 10 (3):337-358.
William Seagle (1942). The Quest for Law. Science and Society 6 (2):190-192.
Leon Shaskolsky Sheleff (ed.) (1997). Social Cohesion and Legal Coercion a Critique of Weber, Durkheim and Marx. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Roger Cotterell (1999). Emile Durkheim Law in a Moral Domain. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gabriel A. Acevedo (2005). Turning Anomie on its Head: Fatalism as Durkheim's Concealed and Multidimensional Alienation Theory. Sociological Theory 23 (1):75-85.
Dean R. Gerstein (1983). Durkheim's Paradigm: Reconstructing a Social Theory. Sociological Theory 1:234-258.
Jacques Janssen & Theo Verheggen (1997). The Double Center of Gravity in Durkheim's Symbol Theory: Bringing the Symbolism of the Body Back In. Sociological Theory 15 (3):294-306.
Ernest Wallwork (1985). Sentiment and Structure: A Durkheimian Critique of Kohlberg's Moral Theory. Journal of Moral Education 14 (2):87-101.
R. Keith Sawyer (2002). Durkheim's Dilemma: Toward a Sociology of Emergence. Sociological Theory 20 (2):227-247.
Stjepan G. Meštrovi (1989). The Theme of Civilization and its Discontents in Durkheim's Division of Labor: Philosophical Assumptions and Practical Consequences. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (4):443–456.
Bernard B. Berk (2006). Macro-Micro Relationships in Durkheim's Analysis of Egoistic Suicide. Sociological Theory 24 (1):58 - 80.
Anne Warfield Rawls (1997). Durkheim and Pragmatism: An Old Twist on a Contemporary Debate. Sociological Theory 15 (1):5-29.
Michael Hammond (1983). The Sociology of Emotions and the History of Social Differentiation. Sociological Theory 1:90-119.
Frank W. Young (1994). Durkheim and Development Theory. Sociological Theory 12 (1):73-82.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #248,087 of 1,911,313 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,064 of 1,911,313 )
How can I increase my downloads?