David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 160 (2):305-321 (2012)
A modus tollens against zero-dimensional material objects is presented from the premises (i) that if there are zero-dimensional material objects then there are bare particulars, and (ii) that there are no bare particulars. The argument for the first premise proceeds by elimination. First, bare particular theory and bundle theory are motivated as the most appealing theories of property exemplification. It is then argued that the bundle theorist’s Ockhamism ought to lead her to reject spatiotemporally located zero-dimensional property instances. Finally, it is argued that since she must accept such instances if she accepts zero-dimensional material object bundles, she ought to avoid the latter. This leaves bare particular theory as the default view of zero-dimensional material objects. The argument for the second premise invokes the thesis that the exemplification of at least one sparse property is a prerequisite for the existence of any particular. It is argued from Humean considerations that bare particulars fail this prerequisite.
|Keywords||Material objects Zero-dimensional objects Bare particulars Bundle theory Recombination|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matteo Morganti (2011). Substrata and Properties: From Bare Particulars to Supersubstantivalism? Metaphysica 12 (2):183-195.
Richard Brian Davis (2013). Are Bare Particulars Constituents? Acta Analytica 28 (4):395-410.
Noa Latham (2002). Spatiotemporal and Spatial Particulars. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):17-35.
J. P. T. MorelandPickavance (2003). Bare Particulars and Individuation Reply to Mertz. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):1 – 13.
Martin Schmidt (2008). On Spacetime, Points, and Bare Particulars. Metaphysica 9 (1):69-77.
Niall Connolly (2011). How the Dead Live. Philosophia 39 (1):83-103.
Theodore Sider (2006). Bare Particulars. Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Richard Davis (2004). The Brave New Bare Particularism. The Modern Schoolman 81 (4):267-273.
Andrew M. Bailey (2012). No Bare Particulars. Philosophical Studies 158 (1):31-41.
D. W. Mertz (2003). Against Bare Particulars a Response to Moreland and Pickavance. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):14 – 20.
Richard Brian Davis (2003). 'Partially Clad' Bare Particulars Exposed. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):534 – 548.
Richard Davis (2008). A Puzzle for Particulars? Axiomathes 18 (1):49-65.
David S. Brown & Richard Brian Davis (2008). A Puzzle for Particulars? Axiomathes 18 (1):49-65.
L. Nathan Oaklander (1977). Particulars, Positional Qualities, and Individuation. Philosophy of Science 44 (3):478-490.
Timothy Pickavance (2009). In Defence of 'Partially Clad' Bare Particulars. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):155 – 158.
Added to index2011-04-11
Total downloads50 ( #26,521 of 1,008,729 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,209 of 1,008,729 )
How can I increase my downloads?