David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Language 21 (3):379–403 (2006)
This paper explores the trade-off between cognitive effort and cognitive effects during immediate metaphor comprehension. We specifically evaluate the fundamental claim of relevance theory that metaphor understanding, like all utterance interpretation, is constrained by the presumption of optimal relevance (Sperber and Wilson, 1995, p. 270): the ostensive stimulus is relevant enough for it to be worth the addressee's effort to process it, and the ostensive stimulus is the most relevant one compatible with the communicator's abilities and preferences. One important implication of optimal relevance is that listeners follow a path of least effort and stop processing at the first interpretation that satisfies their expectation of relevance. They do this by trying to minimize cognitive effort while maximizing cognitive effects. Some relevance theory scholars suggest that metaphors should require additional cognitive effort to be understood, and that in return they yield more cognitive effects than does literal speech. Others claim that metaphors may be understood quickly, as soon as people infer enough effects for the speaker's utterance to meet their expectation of optimal relevance. Our analysis of the experimental evidence suggests that there is no systematic relationship between cognitive effort and cognitive effects in metaphor comprehension. We conclude that relevance theory need not make any general predictions about the effort needed to comprehend metaphors. Nevertheless, relevance theory is consistent with many of the findings in psycholinguistics on metaphor understanding, and can account for aspects of metaphor understanding that no other theory can explain.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Napoleon Katsos (2008). The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface From an Experimental Perspective: The Case of Scalar Implicature. Synthese 165 (3):385 - 401.
Similar books and articles
Dan Sperber (2002). Truthfulness and Relevance in Telling The Time. Mind and Language 17 (5):457-466.
George Lakoff (1980/2003). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
S. Iglesias-Parro, E. I. de La Fuente & A. R. Ortega (2002). The Effect of Context Variables on Cognitive Effort in Multiattribute Binary Choice. Theory and Decision 52 (2):101-125.
Cihua Xu & Hengwei Li (2011). Abduction and Metaphor: An Inquiry Into Common Cognitive Mechanism. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):480-491.
Robyn Carston (1999). The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction: A View From Relevance Theory. In Ken Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface From Different Points of View. Elsevier. 85125.
Markus Tendahl (2009). A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Catherine Wearing (2010). Autism, Metaphor and Relevance Theory. Mind and Language 25 (2):196-216.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads126 ( #6,919 of 1,098,611 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #285,544 of 1,098,611 )
How can I increase my downloads?