Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 24 (3):158 - 173 (1973)
|Abstract||Given all the consequences of an act and the value of each of them, how can we find their value on the whole? In Utilitarianisms: Simple and General, Inquiry 13, 394–449, J. Howard Sobel offers two alternative suggestions. Here one of Sobel's suggestions is attacked and the other given new support. Where the number of consequences is finite, it is argued, their value is the sum of their basic intrinsic values: the basic intrinsic value of a state of affairs is the value it has on its own account, and not in virtue of other states of affairs it entails.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Imtiaz Moosa (2002). Does the Failure of Utilitarianism Justify a Belief in Intrinsic Value? Philo 5 (2):123-142.
Robert F. Card (2004). Consequentialist Teleology and the Valuation of States of Affairs. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):253-265.
Wojciech Sadurski (1988). The Right, the Good and the Jurisprude. Law and Philosophy 7 (1):35 - 66.
Robert Heinaman (2002). Plato's Division of Goods in the "Republic". Phronesis 47 (4):309 - 335.
Stephen Kershnar (2006). Hurka's Theory of Virtue. Philosophia 34 (2):159-168.
Robert Heinaman (2002). Plato's Division of Goods in the Republic. Phronesis 47 (4):309-335.
Shlomit Harrosh (2011). Identifying Harms. Bioethics 26 (9):493-498.
J. Howard Sobel (1970). Utilitarianisms: Simple and General. Inquiry 13 (1-4):394 – 449.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,343 of 739,215 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?