David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Natural realism is the view that there is a real, metaphysical distinction between those properties, perhaps like being a quark, that are natural kinds and those, perhaps like being either red or round that are not. This is a fairly respectable doctrine, though by no means universally accepted. Perhaps slightly less well entrenched is the idea that there is a relation of causal relevance that sometimes holds between a property of a cause and a property of an effect. If causation is a relation between tokens, causal relevance is a relation between types. Finally, there’s the idea that there are many levels. Sometimes, people will talk about the relation between the mental level and the biological or physical level without meaning too much by this. But the straight-faced suggestion that levels are mind-independent features of reality will occasionally raise a skeptical eyebrow. It may be that anyone suspicious about any of these three ideas is suspicious of them all. This is as it should be. I don’t say this because I think the three characters are maximally suspicious, but because the three form a tightly knit family that to a certain extent stand or fall together. If there are natural kinds, then there are real resemblances, or objective similarities between members of those kinds. But not just any similarity counts. There’s at least one respect in which anything three miles from a burning barn is similar to anything else three miles from a burning barn. The similarities that count as far as natural kinds are concerned are causal similarities. Being a member of a natural kind must make a difference to your causal interactions. But the idea of a feature that makes a difference to your causal interactions just is the idea of a causally relevant feature. If you put the white ball into the pocket of an ordinary pool table in a bar, it will come..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Stuart Glennan (2009). Productivity, Relevance and Natural Selection. Biology and Philosophy 24 (3):325-339.
Anthony Dardis (1993). Sunburn: Independence Conditions on Causal Relevance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):577-598.
Douglas Keaton (2010). Two Kinds of Role Property. Philosophia 38 (4):773-788.
David K. Henderson (1994). Account for Macro-Level Causation. Synthese 101 (2):129-156.
Philippe Huneman (2012). Natural Selection: A Case for the Counterfactual Approach. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 76 (2):171-194.
Toby Handfield (2010). Dispositions, Manifestations, and Causal Structure. In Anna Marmodoro (ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations. Routledge
Anthony B. Dardis (2002). A No Causal Rivalry Solution to the Problem of Mental Causation. Acta Analytica 17 (28):69-77.
Kathrin Koslicki (2008). Natural Kinds and Natural Kind Terms. Philosophy Compass 3 (4):789-802.
Elliott Sober (2011). A Priori Causal Models of Natural Selection. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (4):571 - 589.
Alexander Rueger (2004). Reduction, Autonomy, and Causal Exclusion Among Physical Properties. Synthese 139 (1):1-21.
Daniel Heussen (2011). When Functions and Causes Compete. Thinking and Reasoning 16 (3):233-250.
Alexander Rueger (2004). Reduction, Autonomy, and Causal Exclusion Among Physical Properties. Synthese 139 (1):1 - 21.
Daniel Murray Hausman (2005). Causal Relata: Tokens, Types, or Variables? [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 63 (1):33 - 54.
Added to index2010-10-19
Total downloads39 ( #104,375 of 1,796,454 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #346,490 of 1,796,454 )
How can I increase my downloads?