David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):305-308 (2010)
Several disciplines within the cognitive sciences have advanced the idea that people comprehend the actions of others, including the linguistic meanings they communicate, through embodied simulations where they imaginatively recreate the actions they observe or hear about. This claim has important consequences for theories of mind and meaning, such as that people’s use and interpretation of language emerges as a kind of bodily activity that is an essential part of ordinary cognition. Daniel Weiskopf presents several arguments against the idea that experiential simulations play a major role in immediate language use and meaning. We offer several rebuttals to Weiskopf, in which we critique his interpretation of simulation theory, present additional psycholinguistic evidence supportive of the simulation perspective, and suggest that a more traditional theory of linguistic meaning and processing has little psychological and empirical validity.Keywords: Language; Comprehension; Embodied cognition; Embodied simulation; Linguistic meaning, Psycholinguistics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Benjamin Bergen (2005). Mental Simulation in Literal and Figurative Language Understanding. In Seana Coulson & Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (eds.), The Literal and Nonliteral in Language and Thought. Peter Lang. 255--280.
Kristin L. Borreggine & Michael P. Kaschak (2006). The Action–Sentence Compatibility Effect: It's All in the Timing. Cognitive Science 30 (6):1097-1112.
J. Decety (1999). Neural Mechanisms Subserving the Perception of Human Actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (5):172-178.
Raymond W. Gibbs Jr (2006). Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind and Language 21 (3):434–458.
Raymond W. Gibbs Jr & Jessica F. Moise (1997). Pragmatics in Understanding What is Said. Cognition 62 (1):51-74.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel A. Weiskopf (2010). Understanding is Not Simulating: A Reply to Gibbs and Perlman. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):309-312.
Jaakko Kuorikoski (2011). Simulation and the Sense of Understanding. In Paul Humphreys & Cyrille Imbert (eds.), Models, Simulations, and Representations. Routledge.
Marisa Velasco (2002). Experimentacion y Tecnicas Computacionales. Theoria 17 (2):317-331.
Whit Schonbein (2010). Can Computational Simulations of Language Emergence Support a 'Use' Theory of Meaning? Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):59-74.
Ulrich Krohs (2008). How Digital Computer Simulations Explain Real-World Processes. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):277 – 292.
Roman Frigg & Julian Reiss (2009). The Philosophy of Simulation: Hot New Issues or Same Old Stew? Synthese 169 (3):593 - 613.
C. J. Topping, M. J. Rehder & B. H. Mayoh (1999). Viola: A New Visual Programming Language Designed for the Rapid Development of Interacting Agent Systems. Acta Biotheoretica 47 (2):129-140.
Raamy Majeed (2013). Pleading Ignorance in Response to Experiential Primitivism. Philosophical Studies 163 (1):251-269.
Joel Nigg (2005). Reinforcement Gradient, Response Inhibition, Genetic Versus Experiential Effects, and Multiple Pathways to ADHD. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):437-438.
Toni A. Gregory (2006). An Evolutionary Theory of Diversity: The Contributions of Grounded Theory and Grounded Action to Reconceptualizing and Reframing Diversity as a Complex Phenomenon. World Futures 62 (7):542 – 550.
Erich Rast (2009). What Simulations Can't Do. The Reasoner 3 (10):5-6.
Till Grüne-Yanoff (2009). The Explanatory Potential of Artificial Societies. Synthese 169 (3):539 - 555.
Claus Beisbart (2012). How Can Computer Simulations Produce New Knowledge? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):395-434.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads23 ( #85,927 of 1,410,434 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,872 of 1,410,434 )
How can I increase my downloads?