Meaning and normativity

Philosophical Issues 5:95-115 (1994)
The concepts of meaning and mental content resist naturalistic analysis. This is because they are normative: they depend on ideas of how things ought to be.
Keywords Meaning (Philosophy  Normativity (Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $40.25 new (27% off)   $45.56 used (18% off)   $46.95 direct from Amazon (15% off)    Amazon page
Call number B105.M4.G53 2012
ISBN(s) 9780199646074   0199646074
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,720
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Jeff Speaks (2009). The Normativity of Content and 'the Frege Point'. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):405-415.
Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

90 ( #16,519 of 1,413,409 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

9 ( #23,615 of 1,413,409 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.