Graduate studies at Western
Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (6):601-613 (2011)
|Abstract||This paper recognizes that we become bored in our post-modern, consumerist Western world and that boredom is related to this existence and hidden within it. Through Heidegger, it seeks to provide a way to structure our understanding of boredom and suggest ways of acknowledging its cause, and then to allow it to liberate our authentic appreciation of the world of our workplace and what can be learnt through it. Using the approach of focusing on being in a societal workplace environment, and the link to Heidegger’s notion of mood, revealed in Being and Time, boredom’s fundamental role is shown as a complex temporal manifold. Our superficial attempts to deal with things in datable time means that we miss the essential importance of the temporal manifold through which our being is revealed and where the Augenblick, (moment of vision) is the authentic present and temporalises itself of the authentic future (Heidegger in Being and time (trans: J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson). Blackwell, Oxford, 1962 , p. 338). For Heidegger this is to be understood as ecstasis (ibid, p. 338) when the resolute Dasein “is carried away to whatever possibilities and circumstances are encountered (ibid, p. 338). Such resoluteness enables the private capabilities to arise in public practice, not, however, in the conformity of what ‘one does’ (Das Man) but as an authentically choosing being. The challenge of an ontological pedagogy, regardless of its place of revelation that this prescribes a possibly be edifying mission for Dasein. Instead of chasing away boredom through busyness, a moment of vision could produce creative and authentic ways of being|
|Keywords||Profound boredom Moment of vision Learning Heidegger|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sue P. Stafford & Wanda Torres Gregory (2006). Heidegger's Phenomenology of Boredom, and the Scientific Investigation of Conscious Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (2):155-169.
Lisa Bortolotti & Yujin Nagasawa (2009). Immortality Without Boredom. Ratio 22 (3):261-277.
Philip Sinaikin (2009). Bored to Tears? : Depression and Heidegger's Concept of Profound Boredom : A Postpsychiatry Contribution. In James Phillips (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Technology and Psychiatry. Oxford University Press.
Kevin Aho (2007). Acceleration and Time Pathologies: The Critique of Psychology in Heidegger's Beiträge. Time and Society 16 (1):25-42.
James Magrini, The Origin of the Work of Art: Historicality, Temporality, and Destiny in Heidegger's Philosophy of the 1930s.
Tibor Scitovsky (1996). My Own Criticism Ofthe Joyless Economy. Critical Review 10 (4):595-605.
Amedeo D'Angiulli & Lavonia Smith LeBeau (2002). On Boredom and Experimentation in Humans. Ethics and Behavior 12 (2):167 – 176.
Kevin Aho (2007). Simmel on Acceleration, Boredom, and Extreme Aesthesia. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (4):447-462.
Harrison Hall (1984). Love, and Death: Kierkegaard and Heidegger on Authentic and Inauthentic Human Existence. Inquiry 27 (1-4):179 – 197.
Farhang Erfani (2004). Sartre and Kierkegaard on the Aesthetics of Boredom. Idealistic Studies 34 (3):303-317.
Andrew Peter Ross, Rethinking Environmental Responsibility: Heidegger, Profound Boredom, and the Alterity of Nature.
David Egan (2012). Das Man and Distantiality in Being and Time. Inquiry 55 (3):289-306.
Jan-Erik Mansikka (2009). Can Boredom Educate Us? Tracing a Mood in Heidegger's Fundamental Ontology From an Educational Point of View. Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (3):255-268.
Added to index2011-10-19
Total downloads5 ( #170,097 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?