Hypatia 21 (4):1-19 (2006)
|Abstract||: Before women could become visible as philosophers, they had first to become visible as rational autonomous thinkers. A social and ethical position holding that chastity was the most important virtue for women, and that rationality and chastity were incompatible, was a significant impediment to accepting women's capacity for philosophical thought. Thus one of the first tasks for women was to confront this belief and argue for their rationality in the face of a self-referential dilemma|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rachel M. McCleary (1984). Book Review:Visions of Women. Linda A. Bell; Too Many Women? The Sex Ratio Question. Maria Guttentag, Paul F. Secord; Women and Spirituality. Carol Ochs. [REVIEW] Ethics 95 (1):165-.
Marshall Schminke & Maureen L. Ambrose (1997). Asymmetric Perceptions of Ethical Frameworks of Men and Women in Business and Nonbusiness Settings. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (7):719-729.
Joan E. Taylor (2003). Jewish Women Philosophers of First-Century Alexandria: Philo's "Therapeutae" Reconsidered. Oxford University Press.
Mary Ellen Waithe (1995). Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period. Teaching Philosophy 18 (3):290-292.
Ian W. A. Shevill (1966). Christian Chastity: Sex in the 1960's, a Christian Viewpoint on Youth and Morals. Stanton Press.
Catherine Villanueva Gardner (2006). Chastity and the Practice of the World In Hume's Treatise. Hume Studies 32 (2):331-345.
Graham Anderson (1989). Virginia Burrus: Chastity as Autonomy: Women in the Stories of Apocryphal Acts. (Studies in Women and Religion, 23.) Pp. Vi + 138. Lewiston (N.Y.) and Queenston (Ontario): Edwin Mellen, 1987. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (02):410-411.
Jacqueline Broad (2002). Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #122,951 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?