David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):407 – 422 (2006)
Despite the fact that Davidson's theory of the causal relata is crucial to his response to the problem of mental causation - that of anomalous monism - it is commonly overlooked within discussions of his position. Anomalous monism is accused of entailing property epiphenomenalism, but given Davidson's understanding of the causal relata, such accusations are wholly misguided. There are, I suggest, two different forms of property epiphenomenalism. The first understands the term 'property' in an ontological sense, the second in a linguistic sense. Anomalous monism cannot plausibly be accused of either. The first cannot legitimately be applied to anomalous monism as it is incompatible with Davidson's ontology. And accusations of predicate epiphenomenalism, although consistent with Davidson's ontology, are ungrounded regarding Davidson's anomalous monism. Philosophers of mind have mislocated the problem with Davidson's anomalous monism, which in fact lies with the implausible theory of the causal relata upon which it rests.
|Keywords||Epiphenomenalism Mental Causation Metaphysics Monism Properties Davidson, Donald|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. M. Armstrong (1997). A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge University Press.
D. M. Armstrong (1993). A World of States of Affairs. Philosophical Perspectives 7 (3):429-440.
Donald Davidson (2010). Truth and Meaning. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Synthese. Routledge 304 - 323.
W. V. Quine (1953/1980). From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Dwayne Moore & Neil Campbell (2010). Functional Reduction and Mental Causation. Acta Analytica 25 (4):435-446.
Similar books and articles
Andrea Zhok (2011). A Phenomenological Reading of Anomalous Monism. Husserl Studies 27 (3):227-256.
Brian P. McLaughlin (1992). On Davidson's Response to the Charge of Epiphenomenalism. In John Heil & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford University Press
Norman P. Melchert (1986). What's Wrong with Anomalous Monism. Journal of Philosophy 83 (May):265-74.
Ted Honderich (1982). The Argument for Anomalous Monism. Analysis 42 (January):59-64.
Michael V. Antony (2003). Davidson's Argument for Monism. Synthese 135 (1):1-12.
Heinz-Dieter Heckmann (1992). Mental Events Again--Or What is Wrong with Anomalous Monism? Erkenntnis 36 (3):345-373.
Mark Silcox, Mind and Anomalous Monism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Erwin Rogler & Gerhard Preyer, Anomalous Monism and Mental Causality : On the Debate of Donald Davidson's Philosophy of the Mental.
Julie Yoo (2009). Anomalous Monism. In Brian P. McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. OUP Oxford
Rex Welshon (1999). Anomalous Monism and Epiphenomenalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):103-120.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads143 ( #13,006 of 1,725,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #93,164 of 1,725,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?