David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):20 (1985)
Is there anything morally special about free exchange? In asking this, I am asking not only about extreme, so-called “libertarian” views, on which free exchange is sacrosanct, but about more widespread, moderate views, on which there is at least something morally special about free exchange. On these more compromising views, other moral considerations may override the moral importance of free exchange, but even when rights of free exchange are restricted for good reason, something morally important is lost. For some, free exchange may preserve liberty, in some morally significant sense, or realize some such moral value as “to each his own.” Alternatively, a system of free exchange may have a special moral status by virtue of the kinds of pragmatic arguments that economists give, arguments that free exchange produces good social results. Whether free exchange has any such virtues as these is the broad question I address in this paper. I offer what I have to say somewhat in the spirit of an overview. Philosophical scrutiny and economic analysis combine, it seems to me, to delineate fairly clearly what is, and what is not, morally special about free exchange
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
William Nelson (2008). The Epistemic Value of the Democratic Process. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 19-32.
Similar books and articles
Lionel K. McPherson (2002). The Moral Insignificance of ``Bare'' Personal Reasons. Philosophical Studies 110 (1):29 - 47.
Galen Strawson (1989). Consciousness, Free Will, and the Unimportance of Determinism. Inquiry 32 (March):3-27.
Benjamin Vilhauer (2009). Free Will Skepticism and Personhood as a Desert Base. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):pp. 489-511.
Daniel Shapiro (1991). Free Speech, Free Exchange, and Rawlsian Liberalism. Social Theory and Practice 17 (1):47-68.
Steven S. Aspenson (1989). Reply to O'Connor. Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):95-98.
Till Requate (1991). Once Again Pure Exchange Economies: A Critical View Towards the Structuralistic Reconstructions by Balzer and Stegmüller. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 34 (1):87 - 116.
Richard Gale (1998). R. M. Adams's Theodicy of Grace. Philo 1 (1):36-44.
Todd S. Mei (2009). The Preeminence of Use: Reevaluating the Relation Between Use and Exchange in Aristotle's Economic Thought. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (4):pp. 523-548.
Jason A. Beyer (2001). Is the Current Practice of Psychotherapy Morally Permissible? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):85-105.
Gilles Campagnolo & Maurice Lagueux (2004). Les Rapports d'Échange Selon Aristote. Éthique À Nicomaque V Et VIII-IX. Dialogue 43 (3):443-469.
Alexei M. Marcoux (2003). A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):1-24.
Derk Pereboom (2001). Living Without Free Will. Cambridge University Press.
Saul Smilansky (2005). Free Will and Respect for Persons. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):248-261.
Kenneth Boyce (2011). Non-Moral Evil and the Free Will Defense. Faith and Philosophy 28 (4):371-384.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads31 ( #122,031 of 1,789,721 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,435 of 1,789,721 )
How can I increase my downloads?