Why Theology Can and Should be Taught at Secular Universities: Lonergan on Intellectual Conversion

Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):527-543 (2011)
Drawing on Bernard Lonergan's Method in Theology (1972) I argue that theology can be taught because personal knowledge, of which it is an instance, is at the heart of academic inquiry; and it should be taught because critical engagement with basic ways of taking one's life as a whole (religion in a broad sense) furnishes a critique of the typical oversights of contemporary culture. The appropriation of one's subjectivity entails an awareness of an existential dialectic that pushes towards a decisive option for affirming the possibility and worth of growth in one's powers of self-determination and self-transcendence. Thus conversion—precisely defined in terms of this dialectic—has moral and intellectual dimensions whose promotion goes to the heart of the academic enterprise. By separating out those disciplines (systematics, for example) which are mediated by the existential stance taken by the scholar, Lonergan allows theology to be seen as one world view among others
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00807.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 21,305
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Nagel (1979). Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.
Immanuel Kant (2007). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Blackwell Pub. Ltd. 507-508.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Joseph Flanagan (2007). Lonergan's New Context for Theology. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 63 (4):1001 - 1023.
Roland Teske (1990). Bradley and Lonergan's Relativist. Philosophy and Theology 5 (2):125-136.
Oliver O'Donovan (1989). How Can Theology Be Moral? Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (2):81 - 94.
Paul Kidder (2003). The Lonergan-Heidegger Difference. Philosophy and Theology 15 (2):273-298.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

16 ( #235,128 of 1,911,296 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #457,075 of 1,911,296 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.