David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 11 (1):41 – 54 (2001)
Both Confucius and Gandhi were fervent political reformers and this paper argues that their views of human nature and the self-society-world relationship are instructively similar. Gandhi never accepted Shankara's doctrine of.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bart Gruzalski (2002). Gandhi's Contributions to Environmental Thought and Action. Environmental Ethics 24 (3):227-242.
Lloyd Steffen (2008). Gandhi's Nonviolent Resistance. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1):69-81.
Raghuramaraju (2010). Debating Ghandi. OUP India.
Nicholas F. Gier (2007). A Response to Shyam Ranganathan's Review of "The Virtue of Non-Violence: From Gautama to Gandhi". Philosophy East and West 57 (4):561 - 563.
Glyn Richards (2001). Gandhi's Philosophy of Education. Oxford University Press.
Vinit Haksar (2012). Violence in a Spirit of Love: Gandhi and the Limits of Non-Violence. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):303-324.
Raghuramaraju (ed.) (2006). Debating Gandhi. OUP India.
Jiyuan Yu (1998). Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle. Philosophy East and West 48 (2):323-347.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #104,242 of 1,102,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,435 of 1,102,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?