Is realism dead?

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,999
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Laura A. Siminoff (2003). The Dead Donor Rule: Not Dead Yet. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (1):30.
Mike Collins (2010). Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):1-26.
Michael McGhee (1995). The Turn Towards Buddhism. Religious Studies 31 (1):69 - 87.
R. S. Downie (2003). Research on Dead Infants. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2):161-175.
M. Norton Wise (2005). Realism is Dead. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):269-286.
J. Jeremy Wisnewski (2009). What We Owe the Dead. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):54-70.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

42 ( #39,942 of 1,101,118 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

18 ( #8,936 of 1,101,118 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.