Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||6 ABSTRACT. Scientiﬁc realism is a doctrine that was both in and out of fashion 7 several times during the twentieth century. I begin by noting three presuppositions of 8 a succinct characterization of scientiﬁc realism oﬀered initially by the foremost critic..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Ronald N. Giere (2005). Scientific Realism: Old and New Problems. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 63 (2):149 - 165.
Juha Saatsi (2012). Scientiﬁc Realism and Historical Evidence: Shortcomings of the Current State of Debate. In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer.
Stathis Psillos (2001). Studies in Scientific Realism. Foundations of Chemistry 3 (1):79-86.
Terence Horgan & Mark Timmons (1991). New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:447-465.
Ronald Giere (2006). Perspectival Pluralism. In ¸ Itekellersetal:Sp.
Huw Price (2007). Quining Naturalism. Journal of Philosophy 104 (8):375-402.
Arthur Fine (1991). Piecemeal Realism. Philosophical Studies 61 (1-2):79 - 96.
Ronald N. Giere (2005). Is Realism Dead? Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):287-304.
Shaun O'Dwyer (2010). Pragmatism and Anti-Realism About the Past. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (3):401-422.
Thomas Brante (2010). Review Essay: Perspectival Realism, Representational Models, and the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (1):107-117.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads18 ( #74,621 of 739,395 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,395 )
How can I increase my downloads?