David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 64 (4):184 (1997)
This short paper serves as an introduction to a debate between representatives of two fundamentally different points of view regarding the nature of scientific inference. Colin Howson and Peter Urbach represent a Bayesian point of view and Deborah Mayo represents a version of classical statistics called error statistics. The paper begins by reviewing earlier versions of the same two points of view due to Rudolf Carnap and Hans Reichenbach, respectively. After a few remarks about philosophical approaches to understanding scientific reasoning between 1960 and 1980, I turn to substantive differences between the two approaches
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Cortois (2000). Remarks Regarding Religious Points of View and Religious Scholars' Points of View. Ethical Perspectives 7 (4):300-311.
Hans Halvorson (2012). What Scientific Theories Could Not Be. Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.
David Wÿss Rudge (2001). Kettlewell From an Error Statisticians's Point of View. Perspectives on Science 9 (1):59-77.
Henk de bij Weg (2001). The Commonsense Conception and its Relation to Scientific Theory. Philosophical Explorations 1 (1):17-30.
Ingo Brigandt (2010). Scientific Reasoning Is Material Inference: Combining Confirmation, Discovery, and Explanation. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):31-43.
David H. Sanford (1981). Where Was I? In D. R. Hofstadter & D. C. Dennett (eds.), The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul. New York, Basic Books 232-40.
Deborah G. Mayo (1980). The Philosophical Relevance of Statistics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:97 - 109.
Jiri Benovsky (2009). Eternalist Theories of Persistence Through Time: Where the Differences Really Lie. Axiomathes 19 (1):51-71.
Henry Kyburg (1992). The Scope of Bayesian Reasoning. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:139 - 152.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #121,376 of 1,793,264 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #169,500 of 1,793,264 )
How can I increase my downloads?