Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):336-338 (2004)
|Abstract||In the study of judgmental errors, surprisingly little thought is spent on what constitutes good and bad judgment. I call this simultaneous focus on errors and lack of analysis of what constitutes an error, the irrationality paradox. I illustrate the paradox by a dozen apparent fallacies; each can be logically deduced from the environmental structure and an unbiased mind.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ian Gold & Jakob Hohwy (2000). Rationality and Schizophrenic Delusion. Mind and Language 15 (1):146-167.
M. P. Smith (1988). The New Paradox of the Stone. Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):283-290.
Herbert Garelick (1964). The Irrationality and Supra-Rationality of Kierkegaard's Paradox. Southern Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):75-86.
Sarah Buss (2004). The Irrationality of Unhappiness and the Paradox of Despair. Journal of Philosophy 101 (4):167 - 196.
David K. Henderson (1987). A Solution to Davidson's Paradox of Irrationality. Erkenntnis 27 (3):359 - 369.
Nicholas J. J. Smith (2000). The Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference). Mind 109 (433):117-122.
Graham Oddie (2001). Hume, the BAD Paradox, and Value Realism. Philo 4 (2):109-122.
John N. Williams (forthcoming). The Completeness of the Pragmatic Solution to Moore's Paradox in Belief: A Reply to Chan. Synthese.
Donald Davidson (1985). Incoherence and Irrationality. Dialectica 39:345-54.
Simone Gozzano (1999). Davidson on Rationality and Irrationality. In Mario de Caro (ed.), Interpretations and Causes: New Perspectives on Donald Davidson's Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #58,654 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?