The irrationality paradox
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):336-338 (2004)
| Abstract | In the study of judgmental errors, surprisingly little thought is spent on what constitutes good and bad judgment. I call this simultaneous focus on errors and lack of analysis of what constitutes an error, the irrationality paradox. I illustrate the paradox by a dozen apparent fallacies; each can be logically deduced from the environmental structure and an unbiased mind. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Ian Gold & Jakob Hohwy (2000). Rationality and Schizophrenic Delusion. Mind and Language 15 (1):146-167.
M. P. Smith (1988). The New Paradox of the Stone. Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):283-290.
Herbert Garelick (1964). The Irrationality and Supra-Rationality of Kierkegaard's Paradox. Southern Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):75-86.
Sarah Buss (2004). The Irrationality of Unhappiness and the Paradox of Despair. Journal of Philosophy 101 (4):167 - 196.
David K. Henderson (1987). A Solution to Davidson's Paradox of Irrationality. Erkenntnis 27 (3):359 - 369.
Nicholas J. J. Smith (2000). The Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference). Mind 109 (433):117-122.
Graham Oddie (2001). Hume, the BAD Paradox, and Value Realism. Philo 4 (2):109-122.
Donald Davidson (1985). Incoherence and Irrationality. Dialectica 39:345-54.
Simone Gozzano (1999). Davidson on Rationality and Irrationality. In Mario de Caro (ed.), Interpretations and Causes: New Perspectives on Donald Davidson's Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads21 ( #58,654 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |

