David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 85 (3):391 - 416 (1990)
The problem addressed is that of finding a sound characterization of ambiguity. Two kinds of characterizations are distinguished: tests and definitions. Various definitions of ambiguity are critically examined and contrasted with definitions of generality and indeterminacy, concepts with which ambiguity is sometimes confused. One definition of ambiguity is defended as being more theoretically adequate than others which have been suggested by both philosophers and linguists. It is also shown how this definition of ambiguity obviates a problem thought to be posed by ambiguity for truth theoretical semantics. In addition, the best known test for ambiguity, namely the test by contradiction, is set out, its limitations discussed, and its connection with ambiguity's definition explained. The test is contrasted with a test for vagueness first proposed by Peirce and a test for generality propounded by Margalit.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jerry Fodor, Bever A., Garrett T. G. & F. M. (1974). The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar. Mcgraw-Hill.
Donald Davidson (2010). Truth and Meaning. In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Synthese. Routledge 304 - 323.
Laurence Horn (1989). A Natural History of Negation. University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Yannis Stephanou (2010). The Meaning of 'Actually'. Dialectica 64 (2):153-185.
Eric McCready (2012). Emotive Equilibria. Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (3):243-283.
Steven D. Hales (2015). A Problem for Moral Luck. Philosophical Studies 172 (9):2385-2403.
Roberta Colonna Dahlman (2016). Did People in the Middle Ages Know. Acta Analytica 31 (2):139-152.
Similar books and articles
Catherine Atherton (1995). Apollonius Dyscolus and the Ambiguity of Ambiguity. Classical Quarterly 45 (02):441-.
Richard Kaye (1991). A Generalization of Specker's Theorem on Typical Ambiguity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):458-466.
Layman E. Allen & Charles S. Saxon (1994). Controlling Inadvertent Ambiguity in the Logical Structure of Legal Drafting by Means of the Prescribed Definitions of the a-Hohfeld Structurallanguage. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 9 (2):135-172.
W. Kip Viscusi & Harrell Chesson (1999). Hopes and Fears: The Conflicting Effects of Risk Ambiguity. Theory and Decision 47 (2):157-184.
Giovanni B. Moneta (1991). Ambiguity, Inductive Systems, and the Modeling of Subjective Probability Judgements. Philosophical Psychology 4 (2):267 – 285.
Catherine Atherton (1993). The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press.
Qiao Zhang (1998). Fuzziness Â Vagueness- Generality - Ambiguity. Journal of Pragmatics 29 (1):13--31.
Ebbe Groes, Hans Jørgen Jacobsen, Birgitte Sloth & Torben Tranaes (1998). Nash Equilibrium with Lower Probabilities. Theory and Decision 44 (1):37-66.
Giuseppe Attanasi & Aldo Montesano (2012). The Price for Information About Probabilities and its Relation with Risk and Ambiguity. Theory and Decision 73 (1):125-160.
Adam Sennet (2002). An Ambiguity Test for Definite Descriptions. Philosophical Studies 111 (1):81-95.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads83 ( #50,181 of 1,796,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #42,136 of 1,796,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?