OUP Oxford (2006)
|Abstract||Margaret Gilbert offers an incisive new approach to a classic problem of political philosophy: when and why should I do what the laws of my country tell me to do? Beginning with carefully argued accounts of social groups in general and political societies in particular, the author argues that in central, standard senses of the relevant terms membership in a political society in and of itself obligates one to support that society's political institutions. The obligations in question are not moral requirements derived from general moral principles, as is often supposed, but a matter of one's participation in a special kind of commitment: joint commitment. An agreement is sufficient but not necessary to generate such a commitment. Gilbert uses the phrase 'plural subject' to refer to all of those who are jointly committed in some way. She therefore labels the theory offered in this book the plural subject theory of political obligation. The author concentrates on the exposition of this theory, carefully explaining how and in what sense joint commitments obligate. She also explores a classic theory of political obligation --- actual contract theory --- according to which one is obligated to conform to the laws of one's country because one agreed to do so. She offers a new interpretation of this theory in light of a theory of plural subject theory of agreements. She argues that actual contract theory has more merit than has been thought, though the more general plural subject theory is to be preferred. She compares and contrasts plural subject theory with identification theory, relationship theory, and the theory of fair play. She brings it to bear on some classic situations of crisis, and, in the concluding chapter, suggests a number of avenues for related empirical and moral inquiry. Clearly and compellingly written, A Theory of Political Obligation will be essential reading for political philosophers and theorists.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Buy the book||$9.50 used (88% off) $24.50 new (68% off) $75.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Margaret Gilbert (1999). Reconsidering the “Actual Contract” Theory of Political Obligation. Ethics 109 (2):236-260.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2009). We and the Plural Subject. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):235-259.
David Lefkowitz (2007). Review of Margaret Gilbert, A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (6).
Dorota Mokrosińska (2013). What is Political About Political Obligation? A Neglected Lesson From Consent Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):88-108.
Andrés Rosler (2005). Political Authority and Obligation in Aristotle. Oxford University Press.
George Klosko (2004). Multiple Principles of Political Obligation. Political Theory 32 (6):801-824.
Margaret P. Gilbert (2001). Sociality, Unity, Objectivity. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:153-160.
Margaret Gilbert (1993). Agreements, Coercion, and Obligation. Ethics 103 (4):679-706.
Bas van der Vossen (2011). Associative Political Obligations: Their Potential. Philosophy Compass 6 (7):488-496.
George Klosko (2005). Political Obligations. OUP Oxford.
Ian Cook (1998). Reading Mill: Studies in Political Theory. St. Martin's Press.
Daniel Engster (2005). Rethinking Care Theory: The Practice of Caring and the Obligation to Care. Hypatia 20 (3):50-74.
Dorota Mokrosinska (2012). Rethinking Political Obligation: Moral Principles, Communal Ties, Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan.
Daniel Innerarity (2012). The Future and its Enemies: In Defense of Political Hope. Stanford University Press.
Massimo Renzo (2008). Duties of Samaritanism and Political Obligation. Legal Theory 14 (3):193–217.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads8 ( #123,092 of 549,084 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,084 )
How can I increase my downloads?