A valid deduction of the generalization argument

Ethics 86 (1):87-91 (1975)
Critics of marcus singer's deduction of the generalization argument from the principle of consequences and the generalization principle ("generalization in ethics," page 66) insist that his use of "everyone" in that deduction is ambiguous, I.E., "everyone" is used both collectively and distributively, And that the deduction is invalid. In this paper, I provide a valid deduction of the generalization argument from those premises which avoids this difficulty entirely. I argue that the conclusion so deduced is logically and morally equivalent to singer's
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/291983
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,570
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Lansing Pollock (1977). The Principle of Consequences. Philosophical Studies 31 (6):385 - 390.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

17 ( #236,663 of 1,938,538 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #82,549 of 1,938,538 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.