Comparative Assessments of Justice, Political Feasibility, and Ideal Theory
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):39-56 (2012)
| Abstract | What should our theorizing about social justice aim at? Many political philosophers think that a crucial goal is to identify a perfectly just society. Amartya Sen disagrees. In The Idea of Justice, he argues that the proper goal of an inquiry about justice is to undertake comparative assessments of feasible social scenarios in order to identify reforms that involve justice-enhancement, or injustice-reduction, even if the results fall short of perfect justice. Sen calls this the “comparative approach” to the theory of justice. He urges its adoption on the basis of a sustained critique of the former approach, which he calls “transcendental.” In this paper I pursue two tasks, one critical and the other constructive. First, I argue that Sen’s account of the contrast between the transcendental and the comparative approaches is not convincing, and second, I suggest what I take to be a broader and more plausible account of comparative assessments of justice. The core claim is that political philosophers should not shy away from the pursuit of ambitious theories of justice (including, for example, ideal theories of perfect justice), although they should engage in careful consideration of issues of political feasibility bearing on their practical implementation. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Amartya Sen Justice Ideal and nonideal theory Feasibility Capabilities | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMartijn Boot (2012). The Aim of a Theory of Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):7-21.
Nuno Ornelas Martins (2012). Sen, Sraffa and the Revival of Classical Political Economy. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (2):143 - 157.
Amartya Sen (2009). The Idea of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Pablo Gilabert (2011). Feasibility and Socialism. Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (1):52-63.
Jay Drydyk (2012). A Capability Approach to Justice as a Virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):23-38.
Steven Wall (2012). Backing Away From Equality. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (2):96-105.
Brian E. Butler (2010). Sen's The Idea of Justice: Back to the (Pragmatic) Future. Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):219-229.
Joshua Anderson (2012). Sen and the Bhagavad Gita: Lessons for a Theory of Justice. Asian Philosophy 22 (1):63-74.
Evan Riley (2011). Against Sen Against Rawls On Justice. Indian Journal of Human Development 5 (1):211-221.
Mathias Thaler (2011). Comment on Wilfried Hinsch: Ideal Justice and Rational Dissent: A Critique of Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice. Analyse Und Kritik 33 (2):387–393.
Pablo Gilabert & Holly Lawford-Smith (2012). Political Feasibility. A Conceptual Exploration. Political Studies 60 (4):809-825.
J. S. Dryzek (forthcoming). The Deliberative Democrat's Idea of Justice. European Journal of Political Theory.
Hye-Ryoung Kang (2008). A Critique of “Idealized” Non-Ideal Justice Theory in Rawls' Laws of People. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:299-308.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-03-31Total downloads176 ( #1,763 of 549,006 )Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #2,074 of 549,006 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
