Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1):39-47 (1995)
|Abstract||It is a commonplace now among art historians that to say, with Ruskin, that an artist had an "innocent eye" was to give the artist an empty compliment. It would have been to say that the artist possessed something no one could possess, and that, if we follow E. H. Gombrich, the artist was not part of the history of art. Gombrich's goal was to show that the history of art was constituted by artists "making and matching" as they saw and represented more accurately the objects with which their predecessors were only dimly acquainted. So an artist with an "innocent eye" would stand outside of history, or at least outside of history as Gombrich tells it; the artist's work being irrreconcilable with the works that flanked it before and after|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Graham McFee (2010). Defending 'the Artist's Theory': Wollheim's Lost Idea Regained? Estetika 47 (1).
Peggy Zeglin Brand (2006). Feminist Art Epistemologies: Understanding Feminist Art. Hypatia 21 (3):166-189.
Ivan Gaskell (2010). A World Art History and Its Objects by Carrier, David. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (1):65-68.
David Carrier (1993). Why Art History has a History. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (3):299-312.
David Carrier (1998). Introduction: Danto and His Critics: After the End of Art and Art History. History and Theory 37 (4):1–16.
David Carrier (1996). Gombrich and Danto on Defining Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (3):279-281.
George C. Schuetze (2005). Convergences in Music and Art: A Bibliographic Study. Harmonie Park Press.
Erich Neumann (1959/1971). Art and the Creative Unconscious: Four Essays. Princeton University Press.
Laurie Adams (2006). The Making and Meaning of Art. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #161,910 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?