David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Argumentation 16 (1):21-32 (2002)
Words, just because they are words, are not inherently clear. The message they contain becomes clear to those who speak the language and are familiar with the issues and contexts. If the message lacks linguistic clarity the recipient of the message will typically make a query that will bring forth further information intended to clarify. The result might be more words, but it might also involve pointing or drawing, or words that utilize other modes such as references to context, history, and so on. If the ambiguity derives from an inconsistency between, say, words and behaviour, one may look to either mode for clarity. Communication, we must accept, actually occurs in messages, and our ability to transmit information may be limited by any number of factors. When we focus entirely on discursive aspects of communication we limit both the ways in which we receive and ways in which we transmit information. The logocentric fallacy is committed when language, especially in it's most logical guise, is seen to be the only form of rational communication
|Keywords||coalescent logocentric non-logical situational|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Leo Groarke (2015). Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does It Matter? Argumentation 29 (2):133-155.
Similar books and articles
Axel Arturo Barceló Aspeitia (2012). Words and Images in Argumentation. Argumentation 26 (3):355-368.
Peter Jan Schellens & Menno de Jong (2004). Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures. Argumentation 18 (3):295-323.
Rohit Parikh & Ramaswamy Ramanujam (2003). A Knowledge Based Semantics of Messages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (4):453-467.
Chien-Hsing Ho (2008). The Finger Pointing Toward the Moon: A Philosophical Analysis of the Chinese Buddhist Thought of Reference. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 35 (1):159-177.
David Harrah (1963). A Model for Applying Information and Utility Functions. Philosophy of Science 30 (3):267-273.
John Woods (2000). Hasty Generalization. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:221-232.
Ronald Fagin & Joseph Y. Halpern (1988). I'm OK If You're OK: On the Notion of Trusting Communication. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (4):329 - 354.
Christopher Gauker (1992). The Lockean Theory of Communication. Noûs 26 (3):303-324.
David Botting (2012). What is a Sophistical Refutation? Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.
Michael Glanzberg (2011). Meaning, Concepts, and the Lexicon. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):1-29.
Douglas Walton (1999). The Fallacy of Many Questions: On the Notions of Complexity, Loadedness and Unfair Entrapment in Interrogative Theory. [REVIEW] Argumentation 13 (4):379-383.
Robert Elliott Allinson (2007). Wittgenstein, Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu: The Art of Circumlocution. Asian Philosophy 17 (1):97 – 108.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads13 ( #190,121 of 1,725,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,716 of 1,725,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?