Form and Argument in Late Plato

Oxford University Press (1996)
Why did Plato put his philosophical arguments into dialogues, rather than presenting them in a plain and readily understandable fashion? A group of distinguished scholars here offer answers to this question by studying the relation between form and argument in his late dialogues. These penetrating studies show that the literary structure of the dialogues is of vital importance in the ongoing interpretation of Plato.
Keywords Imaginary conversations
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book $60.40 used (12% off)   $60.45 new (12% off)   $68.00 direct from Amazon    Amazon page
Call number B395.F67 2000
ISBN(s) 0199241422   9780199241422  
DOI 10.2307/632273
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,865
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Fiona Leigh (2007). Platonic Dialogue, Maieutic Method and Critical Thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (3):309–323.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

33 ( #96,361 of 1,724,937 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #210,935 of 1,724,937 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.