Hume Studies 26 (1):87-108 (2000)
|Abstract||How much of the “science of man” that Hume goes on to develop is a recapitulation of the work of the other British philosophers and how much is new? When is Hume borrowing the insights of those who came before and when is he innovating? It is difficult to answer these questions, and not just because the rules of attribution in the eighteenth century were looser than in ours. For at times the verve with which Hume writes can lead one to think that he is in the grip of a new discovery when he is in fact recounting the ideas of a predecessor. And at other times Hume puts others’ ideas to work in a manner that they themselves never considered or would have actively opposed.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Noriaki Iwasa (2011). Hume's Alleged Success Over Hutcheson. Synthesis Philosophica 26 (2):323-336.
Marina Frasca-Spada (1998). Space and the Self in Hume's Treatise. Cambridge University Press.
Mark G. Spencer (2005). David Hume and Eighteenth-Century America. University of Rochester Press.
Walter Ott (2006). Hume on Meaning. Hume Studies 32 (2):233-252.
Alix Cohen (2005). In Defence of Hume's Historical Method. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (3):489 – 502.
Jan Staněk (2009). Hume and the Question of Good Manners. Estetika 46 (1).
Angela Coventry (2010). Critical Review of Recent Introductory Works on Hume. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 36 (2):217-225.
Alan Schwerin (2007). Hume and The Self: A Critical Response. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (1):15-30.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,297 of 722,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?