David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 145 (2):215 - 234 (2009)
In the mid-20th century, descriptive meta-ethics addressed a number of central questions, such as whether there is a necessary connection between moral judgment and motivation, whether moral reasons are absolute or relative, and whether moral judgments express attitudes or describe states of affairs. I maintain that much of this work in mid-20th century meta-ethics proceeded on an assumption that there is good reason to question. The assumption was that our ordinary discourse is uniform and determinate enough to vindicate one side or the other of these meta-ethical debates. I suggest that ordinary moral discourse may be much less uniform and determinate than 20th century meta-ethics assumed
|Keywords||Meta-ethics Internalism Externalism Michael Smith R.M. Hare David Brink|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John M. Doris & Stephen P. Stich (2005). As a Matter of Fact : Empirical Perspectives on Ethics. In Frank Jackson & Michael Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Michael B. Gill (1999). Relativity and the Concept of Morality. Journal of Value Inquiry 33 (2):171-182.
Geoffrey P. Goodwin & John M. Darley (2008). The Psychology of Meta-Ethics: Exploring Objectivism. Cognition 106 (3):1339-1366.
R. M. Hare (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford Clarendon Press.
Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (2002). Conceptual Relativity and Metaphysical Realism. Noûs 36 (s1):74-96.
Citations of this work BETA
Ragnar Francén (2010). Moral Motivation Pluralism. Journal of Ethics 14 (2):117-148.
Ragnar Francén (2010). No Deep Disagreement for New Relativists. Philosophical Studies 151 (1):19--37.
Geoffrey P. Goodwin & John M. Darley (2010). The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy. [REVIEW] Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):161-188.
Similar books and articles
James Dreier (2004). Meta‐Ethics and the Problem of Creeping Minimalism. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):23–44.
Polycarp Ikuenobe (2002). The Meta-Ethical Issue of the Nature of Lying: Implications for Moral Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (1):37-63.
Bert Gordijn Rob de Vries (2009). Empirical Ethics and its Alleged Meta-Ethical Fallacies. Bioethics 23 (4):193-201.
Andrew Sneddon (2009). Normative Ethics and the Prospects of an Empirical Contribution to Assessment of Moral Disagreement and Moral Realism. Journal of Value Inquiry 43 (4):447-455.
Abraham Rudnick (2001). A Meta-Ethical Critique of Care Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):505-517.
Heather Dyke (2003). What Moral Realism Can Learn From the Philosophy of Time. In , Time and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 11--25.
Daniel M. Goldstein (2003). Reproductive Technologies of the Self: Michel Foucault and Meta-Narrative-Ethics. Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3-4):229-240.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads95 ( #13,448 of 1,099,910 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #66,909 of 1,099,910 )
How can I increase my downloads?