David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (March) 83 (March):83-103 (1989)
Perception is often analysed as a process in which causal events from the environment act on a subject to produce states in the mind or brain. The role of the subject is an increasing feature of neuroscientific and cognitive literature. This feature is linked to the need for an account of the normative aspects of perceptual competence. A holographic model is offered in which objects are presented to the subject classified according to rules governing concepts and encoded in brain function in that form. This implies that the analysis of perception must consider not only the fact that there is an interaction between the perceiving subject and the perceived object but also that the interaction is shaped by a system of concepts which the subject uses in thought and action
|Keywords||Conception Neuroscience Perception Science Subjectivity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Grant R. Gillett (1989). Representations and Cognitive Science. Inquiry 32 (September):261-77.
Denny E. Bradshaw (1992). The Nature of Concepts. Philosophical Papers 21 (1):1-20.
Grant R. Gillett (1993). Social Causation and Cognitive Neuroscience. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23 (1):27–45.
Grant Gillett (1991). Language, Social Ecology and Experience. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):195 – 203.
Similar books and articles
Wolfgang Prinz & Bernhard Hommel (eds.) (2002). Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance Volume Xix. OUP Oxford.
Susanna Schellenberg (2007). Action and Self-Location in Perception. Mind 115 (463):603-632.
M. Colombo & P. Series (2012). Bayes in the Brain--On Bayesian Modelling in Neuroscience. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):697-723.
N. Gangopadhyay & L. Schilbach (2011). Seeing Minds: A Neurophilosophical Investigation of the Role of Perception-Action Coupling in Social Perception. Social Neuroscience.
Alva Noë & Evan Thompson (1999). Seeing Beyond the Modules Toward the Subject of Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):386-387.
Pete Mandik & Andrew Brook (2007). The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Analyze and Kritik 26 (1):3-23.
Antti Revonsuo (2001). Putting Color Back Where It Belongs. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (1):78-84.
Athanassios Raftopoulos (2001). Reentrant Neural Pathways and the Theory-Ladenness of Perception. Philosophy of Science 3 (September):S187-S199.
Machiel Keestra & Stephen Cowley (2009). Foundationalism and Neuroscience; Silence and Language. Language Sciences 31:531-552.
Peter Carruthers & Vincent Picciuto (2011). Should Damage to the Machinery for Social Perception Damage Perception. Cognitive Neuroscience 2 (2):116-17.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads232 ( #10,418 of 1,793,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)72 ( #8,544 of 1,793,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?