Planning processes and age in the five-disc tower of London task
Thinking and Reasoning 5 (4):339 – 361 (1999)
| Abstract | This paper reports a study of planning processes in the five-disc Tower of London (TOL) task in 20 younger and 20 older adult participants. A concurrent direct ''think-aloud'' method was used to obtain data on planning processes prior to moving discs in the TOL. A check was made of the effects of verbalising by comparing performance data from the experimental groups with data from control groups who did not verbalise during planning or moving. Verbalising slowed down planning and moving but did not appear to distort the participants' approaches to the task. Older and younger participants did not differ in average moves taken to solve the tasks. However, older participants' planning was less complete and more error-prone than that of younger participants. The planning processes were characterised as showing a means-ends ''goal selection'' strategy. In this strategy participants (1) identify a single active goal disc at the start, (2) select moves and move sequences to enable the placing of the current goal disc in its target position, and (3) continue in this way until all discs are in their target positions. Age differences were found in the planning stage, during which there was no stimulus support and hence a substantial working memory load. During the move phase there was stimulus support and hence little loading of working memory. Age differences in moves required were not found in the move phase. As older participants tend to have depleted working memory capacity the present results suggest that working memory is heavily loaded in TOL planning but less so in the move phase of TOL. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBernhard Hommel, Jochen Müsseler, Gisa Aschersleben & Wolfgang Prinz (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A Framework for Perception and Action Planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):849-878.
A. Danek, A. M. Hinz, F. Sürer, N. Kühnpast & A. H. Faber (2011). The Iso-Effect: Is There Specific Learning of Tower of London Iso-Problems? Thinking and Reasoning 15 (3):237-249.
A. Danek, A. M. Hinz, F. Sürer, N. Kühnpast & A. H. Faber (2011). The Iso-Effect: Is There Specific Learning of Tower of London Iso-Problems? Thinking and Reasoning 15 (3):237-249.
A. H. Faber, N. Kühnpast, F. Sürer, A. M. Hinz & A. Danek (2009). The Iso-Effect: Is There Specific Learning of Tower of London Iso-Problems? Thinking and Reasoning 15 (3):237 – 249.
Wim de Neys & Samuel Franssens (2011). The Effortless Nature of Conflict Detection During Thinking. Thinking and Reasoning 15 (2):105-128.
Jos J. Adam & Ron F. Keulen (2004). FMRI Evidence for and Behavioral Evidence Against the Planning–Control Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-24.
David A. Westwood & Melvyn A. Goodale (2001). Perception and Action Planning: Getting It Together. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):907-908.
Troy A. W. Visser & Philip M. Merikle (1999). Conscious and Unconscious Processes: The Effects of Motivation. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):94-113.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
