Should Causal Models always be Markovian? The Case of Multi-Causal Forks in Medicine

Abstract The development of causal modelling since the 1950s has been accompanied by a number of controversies, the most striking of which concerns the Markov condition. Reichenbach's conjunctive forks did satisfy the Markov condition, while Salmon's interactive forks did not. Subsequently some experts in the field have argued that adequate causal models should always satisfy the Markov condition, while others have claimed that non-Markovian causal models are needed in some cases. This paper argues for the second position by considering the multi-causal forks, which are widespread in contemporary medicine.
Keywords Causal Models  Markov Condition  Conjunctive Forks  Interactive Forks  Multi-Causal Forks  Causal Factors in Heart Disease  Bayesian Networks
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links This entry has no external links. Add one.
Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries

Similar books and articles
Wesley C. Salmon (1980). Causality: Production and Propagation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:49 - 69.
DM Hausman & J. Woodward (1999). Independence, Invariance and the Causal Markov Condition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (4):521-583.
Daniel Steel (2005). Indeterminism and the Causal Markov Condition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):3-26.

Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-07-27

Total downloads

72 ( #11,673 of 549,087 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

46 ( #621 of 549,087 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums