|Abstract||This article will compare and contrast two very different accounts of convention: the game-theoretical account of Lewis in Convention, and the account initially proposed by Margaret Gilbert (the present author) in chapter six of On Social Facts, and further elaborated here. Gilbert’s account is not a variant of Lewis’s. It was arrived at in part as the result of a detailed critique of Lewis’s account in relation to a central everyday concept of a social convention. An account of convention need not be judged by that standard. Perhaps it reveals the nature of an important phenomenon. Looked at in that light, these very different accounts are not incompatible. Indeed, neither should be ignored if one is seeking to understand the way in which human beings arrive at some degree of social order.|
|Keywords||social convention David Lewis social phenomena|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Alterman (2008). Activity and Convention. Topoi 27 (1-2):127-138.
Michael Rescorla, Convention. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Margaret Gilbert (1983). Notes on the Concept of a Social Convention. New Literary History 14 (02):225-251.
Margaret Gilbert (1981). Game Theory Andconvention. Synthese 46 (1):41 - 93.
Peter Vanderschraaf (1995). Convention as Correlated Equilibrium. Erkenntnis 42 (1):65 - 87.
Mark H. Bickhard (2008). Social Ontology as Convention. Topoi 27 (1-2):139-149.
Henry Jackman (1998). Convention and Language. Synthese 117 (3):295-312.
Max Kölbel (1998). Lewis, Language, Lust and Lies. Inquiry 41 (3):301 – 315.
Giacomo Sillari (2008). Common Knowledge and Convention. Topoi 27 (1-2):29-39.
Margaret Gilbert (1983). Agreements, Conventions, and Language. Synthese 54 (3):375 - 407.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads74 ( #13,656 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #12,370 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?