David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1):3 - 18 (2001)
Central to Augustine's understanding of rightly ordered sexuality is his belief that the pleasure of the act should not be separated from its good (procreation). It is useful to observe that he reasons in a similar way about eating: that the pleasure of eating should not be separated from its good (nourishment). Inadequacies in his understanding of the purpose of food and eating may be instructive when we think about inadequacies in his understanding of sex. If there is more to food than he imagines, the same may be true of sex. Correcting for such inadequacies may also help correct for the (inadvertent) way in which his understanding of the purpose of sex may seem to legitimize technologies of assisted reproduction
|Keywords||Augustine assisted reproduction food contraception sexuality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Yiftach J. H. Fehige (2012). Quantum Physics and Theology: John Polkinghorne on Thought Experiments. Zygon 47 (2):256-288.
Laura Moncion (2014). Erotic Food Metaphors in Augustine's Confessions. Heythrop Journal 56 (5).
Similar books and articles
Elie Spitz (2001). Sweet Gifts: A Jewish Response to Gilbert Meilaender. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1):19 - 23.
Lisa Sowle Cahill (2001). Using Augustine in Contemporary Sexual Ethics: A Response to Gilbert Meilaender. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1):25 - 33.
Charles T. Mathewes (2001). Original Sin and the Hermeneutics of Charity: A Response to Gilbert Meilaender. Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1):35 - 42.
Myra J. Hird (2004). Sex, Gender, and Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
Clifton Perry (1981). We Are What We Eat. Environmental Ethics 3 (4):341-350.
Stella Sandford (2010). Plato and Sex. Polity Press.
Francesca Tasca (2010). « Ecce panis haereticorum ». Diversità alimentari ed identità religiose nel 'De haeresibus' di Agostino. Augustinianum 50 (1):233-253.
Matthew C. Altman (2010). Kant on Sex and Marriage: The Implications for the Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Kant-Studien 101 (3):309-330.
Peter Singer (2005). Eating Ethically. Free Inquiry 25:18.
Todd K. Shackelford, Gregory J. LeBlanc, Richard L. Michalski & Viviana A. Weekes (2000). Analyses of Mating Differences Within-Sex and Between-Sex Are Complementary, Not Competing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):621-621.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads24 ( #122,873 of 1,725,840 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,700 of 1,725,840 )
How can I increase my downloads?