David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (6):597 - 639 (1992)
English mass noun phrases & count noun phrases differ only minimally grammatically. The basis for the difference is ascribed to a difference in the features +/-CT. These features serve the morphosyntactic function of determining the available options for the assigment of grammatical number, itself determined by the features +/-PL: +CT places no restriction on the available options, while -CT, in the unmarked case, restricts the available options to -PL. They also serve the semantic function of determining the sort of denotation associated with demonstrative & quantified noun phrases. The feature -CT requires that the associated denotation be the set whose sole member is the greatest aggregate of which the noun phrase or noun is true; the feature +CT requires that the associated denotation be the set whose members are all & only those minimal aggregates of which the noun phrase or noun is true. At the same time, neither mass NPs nor count NPs that are arguments of a predicate have their predicate evaluated with respect to their denotations. Rather, the predicate is evaluated with respect to an aggregation, a set of aggregates constructed from the denotation of the noun phrase that is an argument of the predicate. 3 Tables, 4 Figures, 74 References. AA
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Willard Van Orman Quine, Patricia Smith Churchland & Dagfinn Føllesdal (2013). Word and Object. The MIT Press.
Irving M. Copi (2008). Introduction to Logic. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Peter M. Simons (1987/2000). Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford University Press.
Bertrand Russell (1903). Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
Zeno Vendler (1967). Linguistics in Philosophy. Cornell University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Øystein Linnebo & David Nicolas (2008). Superplurals in English. Analysis 68 (299):186–197.
David Nicolas (2008). Mass Nouns and Plural Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (2):211-244.
Gennaro Chierchia (2010). Mass Nouns, Vagueness and Semantic Variation. Synthese 174 (1):99 - 149.
David Barner & Jesse Snedeker (2005). Quantity Judgments and Individuation: Evidence That Mass Nouns Count. Cognition 97 (1):41-66.
A. C. Bale & D. Barner (2009). The Interpretation of Functional Heads: Using Comparatives to Explore the Mass/Count Distinction. Journal of Semantics 26 (3):217-252.
Similar books and articles
Harry C. Bunt (1985). Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Henry Laycock (2005). Mass Nouns, Count Nouns and Non-Count Nouns. In Alex Barber (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier
Roger Schwarzschild, Stubborn Distributivity, Multiparticipant Nouns and the Count/Mass Distinction.
Nino Cocchiarella (2009). Mass Nouns in a Logic of Classes as Many. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):343-361.
David Nicolas (2004). The Semantics of Nouns Derived From Gradable Adjectives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 8. 197-207.
Henry Laycock (2006). Variables, Generality and Existence. In Paulo Valore (ed.), Topics on General and Formal Ontology. Polimetrica 27.
Kathrin Koslicki (1999). The Semantics of Mass-Predicates. Noûs 33 (1):46-91.
H. W. Noonan (1978). Count Nouns and Mass Nouns. Analysis 38 (4):167 - 172.
David Nicolas (2004). Is There Anything Characteristic About the Meaning of a Count Noun? Revue de la Lexicologie 18.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads52 ( #80,968 of 1,796,302 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #283,262 of 1,796,302 )
How can I increase my downloads?