David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge ;Cambridge University Press (2006)
Uncovering the historical roots of naturalistic, secular contemporary ethics, Michael Gill shows how the British moralists of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries completed a Copernican revolution in moral philosophy. They effected a shift from thinking of morality as independent of human nature to thinking of it as part of human nature itself. He also shows how the British Moralists - sometimes inadvertently, sometimes by design - disengaged ethical thinking, first from distinctly Christian ideas and then from theistic commitments altogether. Examining in detail the arguments of Whichcote, Cudworth, Shaftesbury, and Hutcheson against Calvinist conceptions of original sin and egoistic conceptions of human motivation, Gill also demonstrates how Hume combined the ideas of earlier British moralists with his own insights to produce an account of morality and human nature that undermined some of his predecessors' most deeply held philosophical goals
|Keywords||Ethics, Modern Ethics History Ethics, Modern Ethics History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$24.55 used (80% off) $36.00 new (35% off) $54.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BJ602.G55 2006|
|ISBN(s)||0521852463 0521184401 9780521852463|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael B. Gill (2007). Moral Rationalism Vs. Moral Sentimentalism: Is Morality More Like Math or Beauty? Philosophy Compass 2 (1):16–30.
Michael B. Gill & Shaun Nichols (2008). Sentimentalist Pluralism: Moral Psychology and Philosophical Ethics. Philosophical Issues 18 (1):143-163.
Michael Gill (2008). Variability and Moral Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (1):99-113.
Erin Frykholm (2015). Associative Virtues and Hume's Narrow Circle. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):n/a-n/a.
Kate Abramson (2007). Hume's Distinction Between Philosophical Anatomy and Painting. Philosophy Compass 2 (5):680–698.
Similar books and articles
Laurent Jaffro (2008). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):323-324.
Laurent Jaffro (2008). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 323-324.
James A. Harris (2006). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Hume Studies 32 (2):362-365.
J. B. Schneewind (2008). Michael Gill, The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 359pp, $96 Hb. ISBN: 978-0521852463. [REVIEW] Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):209-217.
Neil G. Robertson (2009). The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):221-224.
Elizabeth S. Radcliffe (2007). Review of Michael B. Gill, The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (8).
Stephen L. Darwall (1995). The British Moralists and the Internal "Ought", 1640-1740. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Darwall (1998). Philosophical Ethics. Westview Press.
Francis Hutcheson (1993). On Human Nature. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #161,197 of 1,793,096 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,412 of 1,793,096 )
How can I increase my downloads?