The burden of normality: from 'chronically ill' to 'symptom free'. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment
Journal of Medical Ethics 8:408-412 (2012)
|Abstract||Although an invasive medical intervention, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been regarded as an efficient and safe treatment of Parkinson’s disease for the last 20 years. In terms of clinical ethics, it is worth asking whether the use of DBS may have unanticipated negative effects similar to those associated with other types of psychosurgery. Clinical studies of epileptic patients who have undergone an anterior temporal lobectomy have identified a range of side effects and complications in a number of domains: psychological, behavioural, affective and social. In many cases, patients express difficulty adjusting from being chronically ill to their new status as ‘treated’ or ‘seizure free’. This postoperative response adjustment has been described in the literature on epilepsy as the ‘Burden of Normality’ (BoN) syndrome. Most of the discussion about DBS postoperative changes to self is focused on abnormal side effects caused by the intervention (ie, hypersexuality, hypomania, etc). By contrast, relatively little attention is paid to the idea that successfully ‘treated’ individuals might experience difficulties in adjusting to becoming ‘normal’. The purpose of this paper is (1) to articulate the postoperative DBS psychosocial adjustment process in terms of the BoN syndrome, (2) to address whether the BoN syndrome illustrates that DBS treatment poses a threat to the patient’s identity, and (3) to examine whether the current framework for rehabilitation after DBS procedures should be updated and take into account the BoN syndrome as a postoperative self-change response.|
|Keywords||Deep Brain Stimulation Identity Burden of Normality Postoperative side effects Self|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Frederic Gilbert (forthcoming). Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression: Postoperative Feelings of Self-Estrangement, Suicide Attempt and Impulsive–Aggressive Behaviours. Neuroethics.
Felicitas Kraemer (forthcoming). Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alienation. Neuroethics.
Nir Lipsman & Walter Glannon (forthcoming). Brain, Mind and Machine: What Are the Implications of Deep Brain Stimulation for Perceptions of Personal Identity, Agency and Free Will? Bioethics.
Adrian Carter, Emily Bell, Eric Racine & Wayne Hall (2011). Ethical Issues Raised by Proposals to Treat Addiction Using Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics 4 (2):129-142.
Maartje Schermer (forthcoming). Health, Happiness and Human Enhancement—Dealing with Unexpected Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics.
Farah Focquaert (forthcoming). Deep Brain Stimulation in Children: Parental Authority Versus Shared Decision-Making. Neuroethics.
Cordelia Erickson-Davis (2011). Ethical Concerns Regarding Commercialization of Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. Bioethics 26 (8):440-446.
Karsten Witt, Christiane Woopen, Jens Kuhn, Lars Timmermann & Mateusz Zurowski (forthcoming). Deep Brain Stimulation and the Search for Identity. Neuroethics.
Veronica Johansson, Martin Garwicz, Martin Kanje, Helena Röcklinsberg, Jens Schouenborg, Anders Tingström & Ulf Görman (forthcoming). Beyond Blind Optimism and Unfounded Fears: Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression. Neuroethics.
Laura Klaming & Pim Haselager (forthcoming). Did My Brain Implant Make Me Do It? Questions Raised by DBS Regarding Psychological Continuity, Responsibility for Action and Mental Competence. Neuroethics.
Françoise Baylis (forthcoming). “I Am Who I Am”: On the Perceived Threats to Personal Identity From Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuroethics.
Frederic Gilbert & Ovadia Daniela (2011). Deep Brain Stimulation in the Media: Over-Optimistic Media Portrayals Calls for a New Strategy Involving Journalists and Scientifics in the Ethical Debate. Journal of Integrative in Neuroscience 5 (16).
Grant Gillett (2011). The Gold-Plated Leucotomy Standard and Deep Brain Stimulation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):35-44.
Added to index2012-03-20
Total downloads2 ( #232,501 of 549,090 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,090 )
How can I increase my downloads?