The design argument survives darwinism
Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):29-36 (1924)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNeil A. Manson (2000). Anthropocentrism and the Design Argument. Religious Studies 36 (2):163-176.
Nicholas Humphrey (2006). Consciousness: The Achilles Heel of Darwinism? Thank God, Not Quite. In John Brockman (ed.), Intelligent Thought: Science Versus the Intelligent Design Movement. Vintage.
Benjamin Ives Gilman (1921). The Dilemma of Darwinism. Philosophical Review 30 (5):494-499.
Robert Shaver (2004). The Appeal of Utilitarianism. Utilitas 16 (3):235-250.
Graham Oppy (2002). Paley's Argument for Design. Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Peter J. Bowler (1977). Darwinism and the Argument From Design: Suggestions for a Reevaluation. Journal of the History of Biology 10 (1):29 - 43.
Elliott Sober (2004). The Design Argument. In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub..
Peter van Inwagen (2003). The Compatibility of Darwinism and Design. In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,014 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
