Noûs 39 (3):483–504 (2005)
|Abstract||An electron clearly has the property of having a charge of þ1.6 10 19 coulombs, but does it also have the property of being charged ? Philosophers have worried whether so-called ‘determinable’ predicates, such as ‘is charged’, actually refer to determinable properties in the way they are happy to say that determinate predicates, such as ‘has a charge of þ1.6 10 19 coulombs’, refer to determinate properties. The distinction between determinates and determinables is itself fairly new, dating only to its definition by the Cambridge logician W. E. Johnson early in the last century.1 But despite its newly minted condition the distinction has found little currency in on-going philosophical debates. Or at least until recently. Renewed interest in realist positions about properties, and arguments that the determinable-determinate relation may hold the key to understanding mental causation, have thrust Johnson’s distinction to the fore. With this new attention has also come new ‘optimistic’ positions that endorse the existence of determinable properties. David Armstrong, Evan Fales, and Sydney Shoemaker, among others, have all defended such optimistic accounts that take determinable predicates, such as ‘is charged’, to refer to determinable properties.2 In this paper, our goal is to carefully assess optimism and to argue that a pessimistic view, which rejects the existence of determinable properties, is actually the appropriate default position.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David A. Denby (2008). Generating Possibilities. Philosophical Studies 141 (2):191 - 207.
Jessica M. Wilson (2009). Determination, Realization and Mental Causation. Philosophical Studies 145 (1):149 - 169.
Sara Worley (1997). Determination and Mental Causation. Erkenntnis 46 (3):281-304.
David A. Denby (2001). Determinable Nominalism. Philosophical Studies 102 (3):297--327.
Jessica M. Wilson (2012). Fundamental Determinables. Philosophers' Imprint 12 (4).
Roberto Poli (2004). W. E. Johnson's Determinable-Determinate Opposition and His Theory of Abstraction. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):163-196.
David H. Sanford, Determinates Vs. Determinables. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Robert Schroer (2011). Can Determinable Properties Earn Their Keep? Synthese 183 (2):229-247.
Tim Crane (2008). Causation and Determinable Properties : On the Efficacy of Colour, Shape, and Size. In Jakob Hohwy & Jesper Kallestrup (eds.), Being Reduced: New Essays on Reduction, Explanation, and Causation. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #14,692 of 549,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?