David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
University of Chicago Press (2008)
Exhuming the long-buried religious roots of our ostensibly godless age, Michael Allen Gillespie reveals in this landmark study that modernity is much less secular than conventional wisdom suggests. Taking as his starting point the collapse of the medieval world, Gillespie argues that from the very beginning moderns sought not to eliminate religion but to support a new view of religion and its place in human life—and that they did so not out of hostility but in order to sustain certain religious beliefs. He goes on to explore the ideas of such figures as William of Ockham, Petrarch, Erasmus, Luther, Descartes, and Hobbes, showing that modernity is best understood as a series of attempts to formulate a new and coherent metaphysics or theology. We’re still trying, Gillespie contends, to resolve the tensions inherent in our ideas of God, man, and nature—tensions that arose in the late Middle Ages during a titanic struggle between contradictory elements within Christianity. In the end, Gillespie shows that understanding modernity’s continuing entanglement with Christian metaphysics is crucial to comprehending the hidden possibilities of our confrontation with radical Islam and with the dualistic elements of our own tradition
|Keywords||Philosophy, Modern Philosophy and religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$16.91 used (63% off) $19.85 new (12% off) $20.31 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B791.G55 2008|
|ISBN(s)||0226293459 0226293467 9780226293455|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul R. DeHart (2013). Leviathan Leashed: The Incoherence of Absolute Sovereign Power. Critical Review 25 (1):1-37.
Adam Fforde (2011). Policy Recommendations as Spurious Predictions: Toward a Theory of Economists' Ignorance. Critical Review 23 (1-2):105-115.
Michael Allen Gillespie & Lucas Perkins (2010). Political Anti-Theology. Critical Review 22 (1):65-84.
Patrick Lally Michelson (2010). Slavophile Religious Thought and the Dilemma of Russian Modernity, 1830–1860. Modern Intellectual History 7 (2):239-267.
Ronald Beiner (2010). Has the Great Separation Failed? Critical Review 22 (1):45-63.
Similar books and articles
Kristina Stöckl (2006). Modernity and its Critique in 20th Century Russian Orthodox Thought. Studies in East European Thought 58 (4):243 - 269.
Ziyi Feng (2006). A Contemporary Interpretation of Marx's Thoughts on Modernity. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (2):254-268.
David Burrell (2008). Review of Michael Allen Gillespie, The Theological Origins of Modernity. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (11).
David J. Kangas (2010). Luther and Modernity. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2):431-452.
Andrew Wright (2004). Religion, Education, and Post-Modernity. Routledgefalmer.
Anthony J. Cascardi (1992). The Subject of Modernity. Cambridge University Press.
Peter Fitzpatrick (2001). Modernism and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Allen Gillespie (1995). Nihilism Before Nietzsche. University of Chicago Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #63,778 of 1,096,547 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #150,143 of 1,096,547 )
How can I increase my downloads?