International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):191 – 208 (2005)
|Abstract||This paper discusses the tenets of the politics of postmodern philosophy of science. At issue are Rouse's version of naturalism and his reading of Quine's distinction between the indeterminacy of translation and the underdetermination of theories by empirical evidence. I argue that the postmodern approach to science's research practices as patterns of interaction within the world is not in line with the naturalistic account Rouse aims at. I focus also on Rouse's readings of Heidegger's existential conception of science and Kuhn's concept of normal science. Finally, a strategy of defending science's cognitive distinctiveness in terms of hermeneutic philosophy is suggested as an alternative to the postmodern philosophy of science.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Martha McCaughey (1993). Redirecting Feminist Critiques of Science. Hypatia 8 (4):72 - 84.
Nancey Murphy (1990). Scientific Realism and Postmodern Philosophy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (3):291-303.
David Jon Spurrett (1999). Lyotard and the Postmodern Misunderstanding of Physics. Theoria 46 (93):29-52.
Steve Fuller (2000). The Truth About Science in the Postmodern Condition. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:105-120.
Babette E. Babich, Debra B. Bergoffen & Simon V. Glynn, On The Idea of Continental and Postmodern Perspectives in the Philosophy of Science.
Jeff Kochan (2011). Getting Real with Rouse and Heidegger. Perspectives on Science 19 (1):81-115.
Steven Best & Douglas Kellner, Dawns,Twilights, and Transitions: Postmodern Theories, Politics, and Challenges.
Joseph Rouse (1991). The Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):607-627.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #107,639 of 556,772 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,754 of 556,772 )
How can I increase my downloads?